| Revision as of 05:32, 13 August 2009 editJack Merridew (talk | contribs)34,837 edits →Hapes Consortium: <del>← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:02, 13 August 2009 edit undoTone (talk | contribs)Administrators50,366 edits Closing debate, result was deleteNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{#ifeq:{{#titleparts:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|2}}|Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Log|<span id="Hapes Consortium"/>{{collapse top|bg=#F3F9FF|1=]|padding=1px}}|}} | |||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''delete'''. If anone wants to merge the content, let me know. ''']''' 13:02, 13 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|F}} | |||
| :{{la|Hapes Consortium}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | :{{la|Hapes Consortium}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | ||
| Line 12: | Line 19: | ||
| *"]" is not a compelling reason for deletion. Best, --]<sup>'']''</sup> 17:11, 10 August 2009 (UTC) | *"]" is not a compelling reason for deletion. Best, --]<sup>'']''</sup> 17:11, 10 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Non-Notable''' — ''delete.'' Cheers, ] 05:32, 13 August 2009 (UTC) | * '''Non-Notable''' — ''delete.'' Cheers, ] 05:32, 13 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
| {{#ifeq:{{#titleparts:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|2}}|Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Log|{{collapse bottom}}|}} | |||
Revision as of 13:02, 13 August 2009
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. If anone wants to merge the content, let me know. Tone 13:02, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Hapes Consortium
- Hapes Consortium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article about a non-notable fictional government from the Star Wars universe. The article's content appears to be a simple cut-and-paste from Wookieepedia. Hemlock Martinis (talk) 19:13, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- Smerge/redirect to Star Wars galaxy#Political areas. This is a poorly executed copy-and-paste from Hapes Consortium, whose style conflicts with our fiction guidelines, on a topic which doesn't really meet Misplaced Pages notability standards for a stand-alone article in any case. Its list entry could use a bit of expansion and cleanup though, hence the "smerge". BryanG (talk) 19:40, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:07, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:27, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - no real-world significance whatsoever. There might be a list of political groups or somesuch in the Wikiproject -- but this topic certainly does not warrant inclusion here. --EEMIV (talk) 23:52, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
- And, just to check -- what with the license change and all, what's the rule-of-thumb about e.g. this article, which is a copy-and-paste I'm sure from Wookieepedia (another CCASAL site)? --EEMIV (talk) 03:32, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
- "Non-notable" is not a compelling reason for deletion. Best, --A Nobody 17:11, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
- Non-Notable — delete. Cheers, Jack Merridew 05:32, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.