| Revision as of 15:37, 14 August 2009 editGamaliel (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators93,925 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:38, 15 August 2009 edit undo71.246.220.204 (talk) →3RRNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| Your latest edit to ] violated the ]. Please undo your edit or I will have to file a 3RR report which will result in a block preventing you from editing. ] <small>(])</small> 15:37, 14 August 2009 (UTC) | Your latest edit to ] violated the ]. Please undo your edit or I will have to file a 3RR report which will result in a block preventing you from editing. ] <small>(])</small> 15:37, 14 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| I'm only reverting because others are reverting my work instead of editing. Funny how when you get to two, another editor comes to the rescue. My next effort will be to simply copy and paste to avoid reverting. Leave this entry as is and edit out what you disagree with. I can't help the fact that the historical record does not make Greer look good. It's not Misplaced Pages's job to blame or absolve. Greer was just the driver is a lie. He was a key player in the motorcade and the aftermath. Specifically, he managed the evidence of the crime, which is a point worthy of reflecting in the historical record. I'm not going away and there are plenty of IP adresess out there! | |||
Revision as of 03:38, 15 August 2009
3RR
Your recent editing history at William Greer shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Your latest edit to William Greer violated the three revert rule. Please undo your edit or I will have to file a 3RR report which will result in a block preventing you from editing. Gamaliel (talk) 15:37, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
I'm only reverting because others are reverting my work instead of editing. Funny how when you get to two, another editor comes to the rescue. My next effort will be to simply copy and paste to avoid reverting. Leave this entry as is and edit out what you disagree with. I can't help the fact that the historical record does not make Greer look good. It's not Misplaced Pages's job to blame or absolve. Greer was just the driver is a lie. He was a key player in the motorcade and the aftermath. Specifically, he managed the evidence of the crime, which is a point worthy of reflecting in the historical record. I'm not going away and there are plenty of IP adresess out there!