| Revision as of 16:28, 17 August 2009 editRet.Prof (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers15,357 edits MLA & APA← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:12, 20 August 2009 edit undoRet.Prof (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers15,357 edits IntroNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{fmbox | |||
| | type = system | |||
| | image = | |||
| | textstyle = color: black; font-weight: bold; | |||
| | text = Please do start a new topic, but remember to: {{archives | |||
| | demospace = other | |||
| | title = | |||
| }} | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| }} | |||
| == Ref == | == Ref == | ||
| '''They are important!''' | '''They are important!''' | ||
Revision as of 14:12, 20 August 2009
 | Please do start a new topic, but remember to:
|
Ref
They are important!
A citation is a line of text that uniquely identifies a source. For example:
MLA style
APA style
- Ritter, R. (2002). The Oxford Style Manual. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-860564-1.
It allows a reader to find the source and verify that it supports material in Misplaced Pages.
Cloudbuster: Keep or redirect and merge?
The 2nd Articles for deletion discussion for Cloudbuster closed as "keep," with the note that "any merge/redirect discussions should take place at the relevant talk pages". However, the article was immediately merged and redirected into Orgone energy. The editor who participated in the discussion and then performed the merge believes that the merge/redirect is supported by consensus. I am posting this notice to the talk page of each of the editors who participated in the discussion, including the nominator, to ensure that this is the case. -- Shunpiker (talk) 18:12, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
- - Thanks - Ret.Prof (talk) 15:06, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Tine_2.0
Re your not vote on this AfD, I've asked why you think notability is established, as if it is then I'll change my !vote - as that is my main concern (advertising can be cleaned up). I hope you don't think this is badgering of any kind. Thanks, Verbal chat 08:25, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- I read the comments and thought it was notable - Ret.Prof (talk) 19:49, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
List of fictional deer
I know it's somewhat silly, but I thought you might be interested to see what I've done with the article "List of fictional deer", which you helped to save from "nominated for deletion". Ironically, I had nothing to do with the article until then. I hope you enjoy it. --AuthorityTam (talk) 20:56, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- I did enjoy it. - Ret.Prof (talk) 16:53, 30 July 2009 (UTC)