Misplaced Pages

Flipped SU(5): Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:24, 24 August 2009 editSmackBot (talk | contribs)3,734,324 editsm Add references section and/or general fixes.← Previous edit Revision as of 11:04, 29 August 2009 edit undoTimidGuy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers11,259 edits This sentence is out of place; and those early developers did not create the version described in this article; a popular book should not be used as a sourceNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Refimprove|date=July 2009}} {{Unreferenced|date=July 2009}}
{{Expert-subject|Physics|date=November 2008}} {{Expert-subject|Physics|date=November 2008}}
{{Cleanup|date=December 2006}} {{Cleanup|date=December 2006}}
Line 39: Line 39:
this model does not predicts ]. See ]. this model does not predicts ]. See ].


This theory was invented by ], with some collaboration by ] and ].
This theory was first invented by ] in a paper published in 1982. <ref>S. M. Barr, Phys. Lett. B112 (1982) 219</ref> It was further described in a 1984 paper by J. P. Deredinger, J. E. Kim and ]<ref>J. P. Deredinger, J. E. Kim, D. V. Nanopoulos, Phys. Lett. B139 (1984) 170</ref> and a 1987 paper by I. Antoniadis, ], ] and Nanopoulos.<ref>I. Antoniadis, J. Ellis, J. Hagelin and D.V. Nanopoulos, Phys.Lett. B194 (1987) 231</ref><ref>Stenger, Victor J., ''Quantum Gods: Creation, Chaos and the Search for Cosmic Consciouness'', Prometheus Books (2009) ISBN-10: 1591027136 ISBN-13: 978-1591027133 p 61.</ref>


] ]
Line 111: Line 111:


instead. These couplings do break the R-symmetry, though. instead. These couplings do break the R-symmetry, though.

==References==
{{Reflist}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Flipped Su(5)}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Flipped Su(5)}}

Revision as of 11:04, 29 August 2009

This article does not cite any sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Flipped SU(5)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (July 2009) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
This article needs attention from an expert in Physics. Please add a reason or a talk parameter to this template to explain the issue with the article. WikiProject Physics may be able to help recruit an expert. (November 2008)
This article may require cleanup to meet Misplaced Pages's quality standards. No cleanup reason has been specified. Please help improve this article if you can. (December 2006) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

The Flipped SU(5) model is a GUT theory which states that the gauge group is:

/ Z 5 {\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} _{5}}

Fermions form three families, each consisting of the representations

5 ¯ 3 {\displaystyle {\bar {5}}_{-3}} for the lepton doublet, L, and the up quarks u c {\displaystyle u^{c}} ;
10 1 {\displaystyle 10_{1}} for the quark doublet,Q ,the down quark, d c {\displaystyle d^{c}} and the right-handed neutrino, N;
1 5 {\displaystyle 1_{5}} for the charged leptons, e c {\displaystyle e^{c}} .

It is noticeable that this assignment includes three right-handed neutrinos, which are never been observed, but are often postulated to explain the lightness of the observed neutrinos and neutrino oscillations. There is also a 10 1 {\displaystyle 10_{1}} and/or 10 ¯ 1 {\displaystyle {\bar {10}}_{-1}} called the Higgs fields which acquire a VEV, yielding the spontaneous symmetry breaking

[ S U ( 5 ) × U ( 1 ) χ ] / Z 5 {\displaystyle /\mathbb {Z} _{5}} to [ S U ( 3 ) × S U ( 2 ) × U ( 1 ) Y ] / Z 6 {\displaystyle /\mathbb {Z} _{6}}

The SU(5) representations transform under this subgroup as the reducible representatio as follows:

5 ¯ 3 ( 3 ¯ , 1 ) 2 3 ( 1 , 2 ) 1 2 {\displaystyle {\bar {5}}_{-3}\rightarrow ({\bar {3}},1)_{-{\frac {2}{3}}}\oplus (1,2)_{-{\frac {1}{2}}}} (u and l)
10 1 ( 3 , 2 ) 1 6 ( 3 ¯ , 1 ) 1 3 ( 1 , 1 ) 0 {\displaystyle 10_{1}\rightarrow (3,2)_{\frac {1}{6}}\oplus ({\bar {3}},1)_{\frac {1}{3}}\oplus (1,1)_{0}} (q, d and ν)
1 5 ( 1 , 1 ) 1 {\displaystyle 1_{5}\rightarrow (1,1)_{1}} (e)
24 0 ( 8 , 1 ) 0 ( 1 , 3 ) 0 ( 1 , 1 ) 0 ( 3 , 2 ) 1 6 ( 3 ¯ , 2 ) 1 6 {\displaystyle 24_{0}\rightarrow (8,1)_{0}\oplus (1,3)_{0}\oplus (1,1)_{0}\oplus (3,2)_{\frac {1}{6}}\oplus ({\bar {3}},2)_{-{\frac {1}{6}}}} .

Comparison with the standard SU(5)

The name "flipped" SU(5) arose in comparison with the "standard" SU(5) model of Georgi-Glashow, in which u c {\displaystyle u^{c}} and d c {\displaystyle d^{c}} quark are respectively assigned to the 10 and 5 representation. In comparison with the standard SU(5), the flipped SU(5) can accomplish the spontaneous symmetry breaking using Higgs fields of dimension 10, while the standard SU(5) need both a 5- and 45-dimensional Higgs.

The sign convention for U(1)χ varies from article/book to article.

The hypercharge Y/2 is a linear combination (sum) of the ( 1 15 0 0 0 0 0 1 15 0 0 0 0 0 1 15 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 ) {\displaystyle {\begin{pmatrix}{1 \over 15}&0&0&0&0\\0&{1 \over 15}&0&0&0\\0&0&{1 \over 15}&0&0\\0&0&0&-{1 \over 10}&0\\0&0&0&0&-{1 \over 10}\end{pmatrix}}} of SU(5) and χ/5.

There are also the additional fields 5-2 and 5 ¯ 2 {\displaystyle {\bar {5}}_{2}} containing the electroweak Higgs doublets.

Of course, calling the representations things like 5 ¯ 3 {\displaystyle {\bar {5}}_{-3}} and 240 is purely a physicist's convention, not a mathematician's convention, where representations are either labelled by Young tableaux or Dynkin diagrams with numbers on their vertices, but still, it is standard among GUT theorists.

Since the homotopy group

π 2 ( [ S U ( 5 ) × U ( 1 ) χ ] / Z 5 [ S U ( 3 ) × S U ( 2 ) × U ( 1 ) Y ] / Z 6 ) = 0 {\displaystyle \pi _{2}\left({\frac {/\mathbb {Z} _{5}}{/\mathbb {Z} _{6}}}\right)=0}

this model does not predicts monopoles. See Hooft-Polyakov monopole.

This theory was invented by Dimitri Nanopoulos, with some collaboration by John Hagelin and John Ellis.

Dimension 6 proton decay mediated by the X {\displaystyle X} boson ( 3 , 2 ) 1 6 {\displaystyle (3,2)_{\frac {1}{6}}} in flipped S U ( 5 ) {\displaystyle SU(5)} GUT

Minimal supersymmetric flipped SU(5)

spacetime

The N=1 superspace extension of 3+1 Minkowski spacetime

spatial symmetry

N=1 SUSY over 3+1 Minkowski spacetime with R-symmetry

gauge symmetry group

/Z5

global internal symmetry

Z2 (matter parity) not related to U(1)R in any way for this particular model

vector superfields

Those associated with the SU(5)× U(1)χ gauge symmetry

chiral superfields

As complex representations:

label description multiplicity SU(5)× U(1)χ rep Z 2 {\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} _{2}} rep U(1)R
10H GUT Higgs field 1 101 + 0
10 ¯ H {\displaystyle {\bar {10}}_{H}} GUT Higgs field 1 10 ¯ 1 {\displaystyle {\overline {10}}_{-1}} + 0
Hu electroweak Higgs field 1 5 ¯ 2 {\displaystyle {\bar {5}}_{2}} + 2
Hd electroweak Higgs field 1 5 2 {\displaystyle 5_{-2}} + 2
5 ¯ {\displaystyle {\bar {5}}} matter fields 3 5 ¯ 3 {\displaystyle {\bar {5}}_{-3}} - 0
10 matter fields 3 101 - 0
1 left-handed positron 3 15 - 0
φ sterile neutrino (optional) 3 10 - 2
S singlet 1 10 + 2

Superpotential

A generic invariant renormalizable superpotential is a (complex) S U ( 5 ) × U ( 1 ) χ × Z 2 {\displaystyle SU(5)\times U(1)_{\chi }\times \mathbb {Z} _{2}} invariant cubic polynomial in the superfields which has an R-charge of 2. It is a linear combination of the following terms: S S S 10 H 10 ¯ H S 10 H α β 10 ¯ H α β 10 H 10 H H d ϵ α β γ δ ϵ 10 H α β 10 H γ δ H d ϵ 10 ¯ H 10 ¯ H H u ϵ α β γ δ ϵ 10 ¯ H α β 10 ¯ H γ δ H u ϵ H d 1010 ϵ α β γ δ ϵ H d α 10 i β γ 10 j δ ϵ H d 5 ¯ 1 H d α 5 ¯ i α 1 j H u 10 5 ¯ H u α 10 i α β 5 ¯ j β 10 ¯ H 10 ϕ 10 ¯ H α β 10 i α β ϕ j {\displaystyle {\begin{matrix}S&S\\S10_{H}{\overline {10}}_{H}&S10_{H}^{\alpha \beta }{\overline {10}}_{H\alpha \beta }\\10_{H}10_{H}H_{d}&\epsilon _{\alpha \beta \gamma \delta \epsilon }10_{H}^{\alpha \beta }10_{H}^{\gamma \delta }H_{d}^{\epsilon }\\{\overline {10}}_{H}{\overline {10}}_{H}H_{u}&\epsilon ^{\alpha \beta \gamma \delta \epsilon }{\overline {10}}_{H\alpha \beta }{\overline {10}}_{H\gamma \delta }H_{u\epsilon }\\H_{d}1010&\epsilon _{\alpha \beta \gamma \delta \epsilon }H_{d}^{\alpha }10_{i}^{\beta \gamma }10_{j}^{\delta \epsilon }\\H_{d}{\bar {5}}1&H_{d}^{\alpha }{\bar {5}}_{i\alpha }1_{j}\\H_{u}10{\bar {5}}&H_{u\alpha }10_{i}^{\alpha \beta }{\bar {5}}_{j\beta }\\{\overline {10}}_{H}10\phi &{\overline {10}}_{H\alpha \beta }10_{i}^{\alpha \beta }\phi _{j}\\\end{matrix}}}

The second column expands each term in index notation (neglecting the proper normalization coefficient). i and j are the generation indices. The coupling Hd 10i 10j has coefficients which are symmetric in i and j.

In those models without the optional φ sterile neutrinos, we add the nonrenormalizable couplings

( 10 ¯ H 10 ) ( 10 ¯ H 10 ) 10 ¯ H α β 10 i α β 10 ¯ H γ δ 10 j γ δ 10 ¯ H 10 10 ¯ H 10 10 ¯ H α β 10 i β γ 10 ¯ H γ δ 10 j δ α {\displaystyle {\begin{matrix}({\overline {10}}_{H}10)({\overline {10}}_{H}10)&{\overline {10}}_{H\alpha \beta }10_{i}^{\alpha \beta }{\overline {10}}_{H\gamma \delta }10_{j}^{\gamma \delta }\\{\overline {10}}_{H}10{\overline {10}}_{H}10&{\overline {10}}_{H\alpha \beta }10_{i}^{\beta \gamma }{\overline {10}}_{H\gamma \delta }10_{j}^{\delta \alpha }\end{matrix}}}

instead. These couplings do break the R-symmetry, though.

Categories: