Revision as of 05:02, 28 August 2009 editNightscream (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers169,329 edits →Carolyn Doran and "hive mind": New section.← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:40, 8 September 2009 edit undoHenrydeutschendorf (talk | contribs)32 edits →Why isn't there more emphasis on the role of Jimmy Wales?: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
The emboldened portion of the above passage is outside of quotes, so it appears to be an assertion of the article rather than Cohen. If so, it should be fixed. ] (]) 05:02, 28 August 2009 (UTC) | The emboldened portion of the above passage is outside of quotes, so it appears to be an assertion of the article rather than Cohen. If so, it should be fixed. ] (]) 05:02, 28 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Why isn't there more emphasis on the role of Jimmy Wales? == | |||
There's much that's succinctly put and dead-on in this article, but one of the concerns I have with Misplaced Pages that seems to get minor attention here is not only the level of "authority" it may have acquired whether deserving or not, but that the ultimate arbiter is one person. And the clandestine nature of this - it's not going to be clear to the casual user. This is only briefly hinted at in the article. | |||
I wonder how many of those who have collectively donated a substantial amount of money are truly aware of some of the unsavory aspects of Misplaced Pages culture?] (]) 10:40, 8 September 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:40, 8 September 2009
Note: This is the Talk page for the Misplaced Pages article on external criticisms of Misplaced Pages. Users interested in discussing their own problems with the project should go to the Village Pump where there are specific sections for dealing with various issues. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Criticism of Misplaced Pages article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Criticism of Misplaced Pages article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:
|
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
To-do: E · H · W · RUpdated 2022-01-07
|
- For critical examination of Misplaced Pages by Misplaced Pages itself, see Misplaced Pages:External peer review/Nature December 2005 (40 science articles) and Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2005-10-31/Guardian rates articles (7 articles of general interest).
Carolyn Doran and "hive mind"
Can someone think of a good addition to the "hive mind" section that uses Misplaced Pages's response to the Carolyn Doran article? Most of the stuff I add to articles seems to get reverted, so I'm not even going to try. --Fandyllic (talk) 11:06 AM PST 6 Jan 2008
POV or Vandalism in this article?
In the section on systemic bias is this passage:
Cohen cites the examples of the Misplaced Pages entries on Maoism (which he implies is unfairly characterised as simply the use of violence to impose political ends) and Socrates who (on Misplaced Pages at least) is "Plato's teacher who left behind not very many writings". This last, to readers of the Times Higher Education at least, is patent nonsense, but illustrates the shallow knowledge base of editors who then proceed to make sweeping judgements.
The emboldened portion of the above passage is outside of quotes, so it appears to be an assertion of the article rather than Cohen. If so, it should be fixed. Nightscream (talk) 05:02, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Why isn't there more emphasis on the role of Jimmy Wales?
There's much that's succinctly put and dead-on in this article, but one of the concerns I have with Misplaced Pages that seems to get minor attention here is not only the level of "authority" it may have acquired whether deserving or not, but that the ultimate arbiter is one person. And the clandestine nature of this - it's not going to be clear to the casual user. This is only briefly hinted at in the article.
I wonder how many of those who have collectively donated a substantial amount of money are truly aware of some of the unsavory aspects of Misplaced Pages culture?Henrydeutschendorf (talk) 10:40, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Categories:- All unassessed articles
- B-Class Misplaced Pages articles
- High-importance Misplaced Pages articles
- WikiProject Misplaced Pages articles
- B-Class Alternative views articles
- Low-importance Alternative views articles
- WikiProject Alternative views articles
- Misplaced Pages pages referenced by the press
- Misplaced Pages controversial topics
- Misplaced Pages pages with to-do lists