Revision as of 00:43, 29 August 2009 editBrandon (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators22,414 edits checked← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:43, 29 August 2009 edit undoSPCUClerkbot (talk | contribs)30,768 edits BOT updates, actions follow: (Removing duplicate checkuser template on master account) (listing accounts notified)Next edit → | ||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
{{endorse}} – I highly doubt that coincidence brought WizardSleeve/IP to the discussion out of thin air. It's either a blatant attempt at meatpuppetry, or the two registered accounts are in fact the same person. Hence, we could use CU to look for any technical evidence between the two registered accounts. ] 23:56, 28 August 2009 (UTC) | {{endorse}} – I highly doubt that coincidence brought WizardSleeve/IP to the discussion out of thin air. It's either a blatant attempt at meatpuppetry, or the two registered accounts are in fact the same person. Hence, we could use CU to look for any technical evidence between the two registered accounts. ] 23:56, 28 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
⚫ | ;Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments {{confirmed}} as {{checkip|1=67.84.209.35}}. {{checkuser|1=WizardSleeve}} is {{unlikely}} but same geographic region/ISP; possible meat puppet. ] (]) 00:43, 29 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
;Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments | |||
⚫ | |||
;Conclusions | ;Conclusions |
Revision as of 00:43, 29 August 2009
FuriousJorge
FuriousJorge (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/FuriousJorge/Archive.
Report date August 27 2009, 18:41 (UTC)
- Suspected sockpuppets
- WizardSleeve (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- 67.84.209.35 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- Evidence submitted by Daedalus969
This IP shows up after the suspected master account relays that one more person is needed to decide the outcome of a discussion on a talk page.— Dædαlus 18:41, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
- Comments by accused parties See Defending yourself against claims.
- LOL! Let me know how the investigation turns out.FuriousJorge (talk) 20:21, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
- Comments by other users
- CheckUser requests
{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.
- Checkuser request – code letter: F (Other reason )
- Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below. Requested by — Dædαlus 18:41, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
This is vote fraud, but not in the traditional sense. It is vote fraud in the process of determining if article consensus exists amongst editors. CU is needed as it is not clear cut, and the IP may not be related, but there is a good chance it is.— Dædαlus 18:41, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
- For future reference, you're better off waiting for more than a single edit before requesting CU. Nathan 14:36, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
- Then may I simply withdraw the CU request?— Dædαlus 19:18, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Clerk endorsed – I highly doubt that coincidence brought WizardSleeve/IP to the discussion out of thin air. It's either a blatant attempt at meatpuppetry, or the two registered accounts are in fact the same person. Hence, we could use CU to look for any technical evidence between the two registered accounts. MuZemike 23:56, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
- Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments Confirmed as 67.84.209.35 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log)). WizardSleeve (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) is Unlikely but same geographic region/ISP; possible meat puppet. Brandon (talk) 00
- 43, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
- Conclusions
Category: