| Revision as of 17:27, 6 September 2009 editHBC AIV helperbot3 (talk | contribs)140,330 editsm 1 IP & 2 users left. rm 204.145.108.46 (blocked by Mentifisto (AO ACB)).← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:47, 6 September 2009 edit undo69.213.86.67 (talk) →User-reportedNext edit → | ||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
| * {{Vandal|Silver7too}} disruptive editing ] (]) 16:53, 6 September 2009 (UTC) | * {{Vandal|Silver7too}} disruptive editing ] (]) 16:53, 6 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :{{AIV|nv}} While they may be disruptive (consider taking this to ]), AIV is for clear-cut cases of vandalism ''only''. Cheers, ''''']''''''<sup><small>]</sup></small> 17:05, 6 September 2009 (UTC) | :{{AIV|nv}} While they may be disruptive (consider taking this to ]), AIV is for clear-cut cases of vandalism ''only''. Cheers, ''''']''''''<sup><small>]</sup></small> 17:05, 6 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| * {{Vandal|Tranquillity Base}} On ] user has been citing numerous reasons to remove the word "eco-terrosim" from the article. As a stated supporter, at first the edits seemed good faith however ill-conceived. After other users demonstrating proper citations, following WP:Terrorist guidelines and multiple users explaining the situation it appears that the user is now attempting simply to maintain a positive web prescence for the organization. --] (]) 17:47, 6 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:47, 6 September 2009
| Noticeboards | |
|---|---|
| Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes. | |
| General | |
| Articles and content | |
| Page handling | |
| User conduct | |
| Other | |
| Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards | |
Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.
Important!- The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
- Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
- The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
- If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
* {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
- Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
- Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
- This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
This page was last updated at 08:52 on 27 December 2024 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Alerts
Bot-reported
User-reported
- Bagelboy257 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - On User talk:Anthony.bradbury ; vandalism after final warning, actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account 15:11, 6 September 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Apbiologyrocks (talk • contribs)
- To be fair, I think he was annoyed by my deletion of what was clearly a good-faith article, although it was definitely speediable as posted. I would be happy to stand back and see what else happens before applying sanctions. This comment is in no way meant to be a criticism of the nominating editor. --Anthony.bradbury 15:26, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- 90.202.94.12 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Daily reversion of edits that violate WP:OVERLINK, WP:OTHERDATE, WP:BLOGS, WP:ELNO and WP:BLP. Blocks in the past have resulted in improved behavior. Other attempts to work with this anonymous editor have not worked. --Dbratland (talk) 16:17, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- Silver7too (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) disruptive editing RaseaC (talk) 16:53, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. While they may be disruptive (consider taking this to ANI), AIV is for clear-cut cases of vandalism only. Cheers, I' 17:05, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- Tranquillity Base (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) On Sea Shepherd Conservation Societ user has been citing numerous reasons to remove the word "eco-terrosim" from the article. As a stated supporter, at first the edits seemed good faith however ill-conceived. After other users demonstrating proper citations, following WP:Terrorist guidelines and multiple users explaining the situation it appears that the user is now attempting simply to maintain a positive web prescence for the organization. --69.213.86.67 (talk) 17:47, 6 September 2009 (UTC)