Revision as of 17:47, 6 September 2009 edit69.213.86.67 (talk) →User-reported← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:56, 6 September 2009 edit undoHmr (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,470 edits →AlertsNext edit → | ||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
* {{Vandal|Tranquillity Base}} On ] user has been citing numerous reasons to remove the word "eco-terrosim" from the article. As a stated supporter, at first the edits seemed good faith however ill-conceived. After other users demonstrating proper citations, following WP:Terrorist guidelines and multiple users explaining the situation it appears that the user is now attempting simply to maintain a positive web prescence for the organization. --] (]) 17:47, 6 September 2009 (UTC) | * {{Vandal|Tranquillity Base}} On ] user has been citing numerous reasons to remove the word "eco-terrosim" from the article. As a stated supporter, at first the edits seemed good faith however ill-conceived. After other users demonstrating proper citations, following WP:Terrorist guidelines and multiple users explaining the situation it appears that the user is now attempting simply to maintain a positive web prescence for the organization. --] (]) 17:47, 6 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
* {{Vandal|Nvadertim7}} – Constantly adding incorrect characters on a talk page of ]. ] 18:55, 06 September 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:56, 6 September 2009
Noticeboards | |
---|---|
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes. | |
General | |
Articles and content | |
Page handling | |
User conduct | |
Other | |
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards |
Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.
Important!- The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
- Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
- The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
- If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
* {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
- Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
- Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
- This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
This page was last updated at 18:52 on 26 December 2024 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.
This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Alerts
Bot-reported
- 24.73.39.22 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 260 five times in the last 5 minutes (Common vandal phrases, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:52, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
- Bagelboy257 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - On User talk:Anthony.bradbury ; vandalism after final warning, actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account 15:11, 6 September 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Apbiologyrocks (talk • contribs)
- To be fair, I think he was annoyed by my deletion of what was clearly a good-faith article, although it was definitely speediable as posted. I would be happy to stand back and see what else happens before applying sanctions. This comment is in no way meant to be a criticism of the nominating editor. --Anthony.bradbury 15:26, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- 90.202.94.12 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Daily reversion of edits that violate WP:OVERLINK, WP:OTHERDATE, WP:BLOGS, WP:ELNO and WP:BLP. Blocks in the past have resulted in improved behavior. Other attempts to work with this anonymous editor have not worked. --Dbratland (talk) 16:17, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- Silver7too (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) disruptive editing RaseaC (talk) 16:53, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. While they may be disruptive (consider taking this to ANI), AIV is for clear-cut cases of vandalism only. Cheers, I' 17:05, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- Tranquillity Base (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) On Sea Shepherd Conservation Societ user has been citing numerous reasons to remove the word "eco-terrosim" from the article. As a stated supporter, at first the edits seemed good faith however ill-conceived. After other users demonstrating proper citations, following WP:Terrorist guidelines and multiple users explaining the situation it appears that the user is now attempting simply to maintain a positive web prescence for the organization. --69.213.86.67 (talk) 17:47, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- Nvadertim7 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Constantly adding incorrect characters on a talk page of Mickey's House of Villains. HMR 18:55, 06 September 2009 (UTC)