Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Vincent Caso: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:50, 7 September 2009 editMathieas (talk | contribs)307 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 21:35, 7 September 2009 edit undoMrFizyx (talk | contribs)6,843 edits Vincent Caso: Yes, but how does it meet criteria?Next edit →
Line 6: Line 6:
One of my wikistalkers ] feels the need to disagree/revert me, so I have to spam another afd. Subject seems to fail ]/] and seems to be only known for being in ] so redirect there. ] (]) 12:30, 7 September 2009 (UTC) One of my wikistalkers ] feels the need to disagree/revert me, so I have to spam another afd. Subject seems to fail ]/] and seems to be only known for being in ] so redirect there. ] (]) 12:30, 7 September 2009 (UTC)


'''Comment''' First off, I recent the baseless accusation that I am a wikistalker. Second I find it laughable that ] is concerned with spamming afd subjects given the number of articles he has nominated for deletion in the past two weeks. Third, ] unilaterally decided to replace an article with a redirect, I reverted it and stated on the articles talk page that I believed it warranted discussion and nomination before being deleted. He then went and replaced the article again with a redirect. So yes I do disagree with him. ] (]) 15:50, 7 September 2009 (UTC) *'''Comment''' First off, I recent the baseless accusation that I am a wikistalker. Second I find it laughable that ] is concerned with spamming afd subjects given the number of articles he has nominated for deletion in the past two weeks. Third, ] unilaterally decided to replace an article with a redirect, I reverted it and stated on the articles talk page that I believed it warranted discussion and nomination before being deleted. He then went and replaced the article again with a redirect. So yes I do disagree with him. ] (]) 15:50, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
**OK, so his comments about you and about "spamming" are unproductive at best, and are maybe even un]. Fine. So, why do you feel this subject passes notability criteria (]/])? -] (]) 21:35, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:35, 7 September 2009

Vincent Caso

Vincent Caso (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One of my wikistalkers User:Mathieas feels the need to disagree/revert me, so I have to spam another afd. Subject seems to fail WP:BIO/WP:N and seems to be only known for being in The Guild so redirect there. Otterathome (talk) 12:30, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

  • Comment First off, I recent the baseless accusation that I am a wikistalker. Second I find it laughable that User:Otterathome is concerned with spamming afd subjects given the number of articles he has nominated for deletion in the past two weeks. Third, User:Otterathome unilaterally decided to replace an article with a redirect, I reverted it and stated on the articles talk page that I believed it warranted discussion and nomination before being deleted. He then went and replaced the article again with a redirect. So yes I do disagree with him. Mathieas (talk) 15:50, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Categories: