Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Vincent Caso: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:35, 7 September 2009 editMrFizyx (talk | contribs)6,843 edits Vincent Caso: Yes, but how does it meet criteria?← Previous edit Revision as of 22:38, 7 September 2009 edit undoRogerborg (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users595 edits Vincent CasoNext edit →
Line 8: Line 8:
*'''Comment''' First off, I recent the baseless accusation that I am a wikistalker. Second I find it laughable that ] is concerned with spamming afd subjects given the number of articles he has nominated for deletion in the past two weeks. Third, ] unilaterally decided to replace an article with a redirect, I reverted it and stated on the articles talk page that I believed it warranted discussion and nomination before being deleted. He then went and replaced the article again with a redirect. So yes I do disagree with him. ] (]) 15:50, 7 September 2009 (UTC) *'''Comment''' First off, I recent the baseless accusation that I am a wikistalker. Second I find it laughable that ] is concerned with spamming afd subjects given the number of articles he has nominated for deletion in the past two weeks. Third, ] unilaterally decided to replace an article with a redirect, I reverted it and stated on the articles talk page that I believed it warranted discussion and nomination before being deleted. He then went and replaced the article again with a redirect. So yes I do disagree with him. ] (]) 15:50, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
**OK, so his comments about you and about "spamming" are unproductive at best, and are maybe even un]. Fine. So, why do you feel this subject passes notability criteria (]/])? -] (]) 21:35, 7 September 2009 (UTC) **OK, so his comments about you and about "spamming" are unproductive at best, and are maybe even un]. Fine. So, why do you feel this subject passes notability criteria (]/])? -] (]) 21:35, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

It's borderline. ] requires "significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." Well, true, if 'multiple' is 'two', and 'notable' is 'can be read about online'. Given that he's actively working, I'd veer towards keep, for now. ] (]) 22:38, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:38, 7 September 2009

Vincent Caso

Vincent Caso (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One of my wikistalkers User:Mathieas feels the need to disagree/revert me, so I have to spam another afd. Subject seems to fail WP:BIO/WP:N and seems to be only known for being in The Guild so redirect there. Otterathome (talk) 12:30, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

  • Comment First off, I recent the baseless accusation that I am a wikistalker. Second I find it laughable that User:Otterathome is concerned with spamming afd subjects given the number of articles he has nominated for deletion in the past two weeks. Third, User:Otterathome unilaterally decided to replace an article with a redirect, I reverted it and stated on the articles talk page that I believed it warranted discussion and nomination before being deleted. He then went and replaced the article again with a redirect. So yes I do disagree with him. Mathieas (talk) 15:50, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

It's borderline. WP:BIO requires "significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." Well, true, if 'multiple' is 'two', and 'notable' is 'can be read about online'. Given that he's actively working, I'd veer towards keep, for now. Rogerborg (talk) 22:38, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Categories: