Misplaced Pages

User talk:Volunteer Marek: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:04, 13 September 2009 editLokiiT (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,259 edits Sockpuppeting← Previous edit Revision as of 03:06, 13 September 2009 edit undoVolunteer Marek (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers94,084 edits SockpuppetingNext edit →
Line 43: Line 43:
:::::Making false accusations of sock puppeting is serious business and generally lowers the level of discussion on Misplaced Pages. Also, because this is an article I am involved in, this is certainly my business.] (]) 02:53, 13 September 2009 (UTC) :::::Making false accusations of sock puppeting is serious business and generally lowers the level of discussion on Misplaced Pages. Also, because this is an article I am involved in, this is certainly my business.] (]) 02:53, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
::::::Then why don't you report me if it's such a serious matter. The thought just occurred to me, you seem pretty darn sure of yourself that these suspicious one-time-use IPs don't belong to him. Yet it's obvious that they belong to someone involved in that article's dispute. Is there anything you aren't sharing here? One way or another I think it's important to find out who's using anonymous IPs to revert war. ] (]) 02:55, 13 September 2009 (UTC) ::::::Then why don't you report me if it's such a serious matter. The thought just occurred to me, you seem pretty darn sure of yourself that these suspicious one-time-use IPs don't belong to him. Yet it's obvious that they belong to someone involved in that article's dispute. Is there anything you aren't sharing here? One way or another I think it's important to find out who's using anonymous IPs to revert war. ] (]) 02:55, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
::::::Are you making yet another baseless accusation?] (]) 03:06, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:06, 13 September 2009



Archives

Arch1



This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

What do you think?

]

Important

] ]

Notification

Help Please, on Chodaczkow Wielki massacre

I know you're busy, but this shouldn't take too much time. Tymek has already supported me there, perhaps you can offer your opinion. Someone keeps trying to insert info from non-reliable sources. Could you check out the talk page and offer your opinion? Thanks!Faustian (talk) 16:50, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

O co chodzi? Komański i Siekierka nie są wiarygodnym źródłem? Nawet ZUwP nie protestowało przy ich książkach. Motyka w Ukraińskiej Partyzantce daje kilka przypisów do ich książki. Nie może tak być że nie wygodne fakty dla Ukraińców są komentowane jako nierzetelne książki. Siemaszkowie nie, Siekierka nie, Filar nie itd itd to na czym mamy opierać opisywanie faktów? Czytałeś choć fragmenty ich książki?--Paweł5586 (talk) 09:37, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Could you correct me. Redgards--Paweł5586 (talk) 19:33, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Thank you--Paweł5586 (talk) 07:11, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Translation

Dear Radeksz, can you provide the translation? AdjustShift (talk) 20:16, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Requested move of World War II evacuation and expulsion articles

I recently began a centralized discussion for the renaming of population transfer or forced migrations relating to WWII. You have shown interest in the topic in the past so I wanted to bring the discussion at Talk:World_War_II_evacuation_and_expulsion#Requested_move to your attention. --Labattblueboy (talk) 13:10, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppeting

Regarding your question in your edit summary, there is a good case to be made that Vecrumba is User:84.65.174.113 and User:84.68.27.75. LokiiT (talk) 02:14, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Vecrumba resides very far from there. If it makes a good case, what would make a poor case, Krawndawg? Colchicum (talk) 02:22, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Do you know what a Proxy is? Moreover, are you aware that people sometimes go on business trips/vacations to other countries? The location of an IP proves nothing. The activity is highly suspicious. And what does my former account have to do with this discussion? That account was discovered by accident when someone accused me of being someone else's sockpuppet, so yeah, this does make a better case. LokiiT (talk) 02:29, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
LokiiT, either file a Checkuser request or stop making baseless accusations.radek (talk) 02:36, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Why don't you mind your own business and stop acting like you're some sort of authority. Please and thanks. I'm not out to get people, so if he is socking, I have given him a chance to stop. If he continues, it will be obvious and I will report it. And if he's not socking at all, I have simply made a mistake and no harm has been done. But again, this is none of your business so I ask you to please keep your nose out of conflicts that do not involve you.LokiiT (talk) 02:45, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Making false accusations of sock puppeting is serious business and generally lowers the level of discussion on Misplaced Pages. Also, because this is an article I am involved in, this is certainly my business.radek (talk) 02:53, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Then why don't you report me if it's such a serious matter. The thought just occurred to me, you seem pretty darn sure of yourself that these suspicious one-time-use IPs don't belong to him. Yet it's obvious that they belong to someone involved in that article's dispute. Is there anything you aren't sharing here? One way or another I think it's important to find out who's using anonymous IPs to revert war. LokiiT (talk) 02:55, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Are you making yet another baseless accusation?radek (talk) 03:06, 13 September 2009 (UTC)