Revision as of 17:02, 22 September 2009 editLudvikus (talk | contribs)21,211 editsm moved Talk:Revisionist historians to Talk:Revisionist historians (American): appropriate distinction← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:42, 22 September 2009 edit undoNorth Shoreman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers46,519 edits DAB pageNext edit → | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
He probably should be discussed in this article because of his "revisionist" view as to Germany's alleged "war guilt" - for starting WWI. --] (]) 04:37, 22 September 2009 (UTC) | He probably should be discussed in this article because of his "revisionist" view as to Germany's alleged "war guilt" - for starting WWI. --] (]) 04:37, 22 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
==Revision of DAB page== | |||
There is no distinctly American version of historical revisionism -- instead, as the article ] makes clear, revisionism is a legitimate process that covers historians in all countries. Also the DAB page needs to cover the subject ] which includes, but is not limited, to Holocaust denial. There is a long history on the discussion pages of the revisionism articles that shows how this division developed. The new stubb article does a very poor job, at present, in summarizing American historians and revisionism. ] (]) 18:42, 22 September 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:42, 22 September 2009
History Redirect‑class | |||||||
|
Holocaust denial
See discussion at Talk:Holocaust denial. --Ludvikus (talk) 13:47, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Revisionist historians vs. Historical revisionism
The two are not to be confused. --Ludvikus (talk) 13:51, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
List of notable revisionist historians
This include the following(--Ludvikus (talk) 15:03, 13 May 2008 (UTC)):
- *
Harry Elmer Barnes
He probably should be discussed in this article because of his "revisionist" view as to Germany's alleged "war guilt" - for starting WWI. --Ludvikus (talk) 04:37, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Revision of DAB page
There is no distinctly American version of historical revisionism -- instead, as the article Historical revisionism makes clear, revisionism is a legitimate process that covers historians in all countries. Also the DAB page needs to cover the subject Historical revisionism (negationism which includes, but is not limited, to Holocaust denial. There is a long history on the discussion pages of the revisionism articles that shows how this division developed. The new stubb article does a very poor job, at present, in summarizing American historians and revisionism. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 18:42, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Categories: