| Revision as of 16:02, 24 September 2009 editSimonm223 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users14,346 edits Creating deletion discussion page for Communist Genocide (2nd nomination)← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:04, 24 September 2009 edit undoSimonm223 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users14,346 edits typoNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| :(I don't know where the nominator's gone, but anyway:) | |||
| ===]=== | |||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|S}} | |||
| <div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Communist Genocide}}</ul></div> | |||
| :{{la|Communist Genocide}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | |||
| :({{findsources|Communist Genocide}}) | |||
| Other editor edit conflict prevented production of normal tagging for AfD discussion. POV of this article is irreparably flawed. There is no improvement in article since closure of last AfD (in August). ] (]) 16:02, 24 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| '''Oppose''' and '''dispute this AfD process'''. This nomination is against ] and I believe is an attempt to forum shop. It is against ] because the article is ], which should be closed by an admin any time now (7 days after original posting) - with 11 editors in favour of moving, and two against. (the nominator of this AfD "conditionally" for, although that may be a position borne out of sarcasm). It's forum shopping, as an RfC was called earlier today by one of the other opposed editors, with as yet no impact on the consensus, and not even that has been allowed to run its course. A lot of work has been done to get agreement on how to move forward, and the title change is the first step.] (]) 15:49, 24 September 2009 (UTC) | '''Oppose''' and '''dispute this AfD process'''. This nomination is against ] and I believe is an attempt to forum shop. It is against ] because the article is ], which should be closed by an admin any time now (7 days after original posting) - with 11 editors in favour of moving, and two against. (the nominator of this AfD "conditionally" for, although that may be a position borne out of sarcasm). It's forum shopping, as an RfC was called earlier today by one of the other opposed editors, with as yet no impact on the consensus, and not even that has been allowed to run its course. A lot of work has been done to get agreement on how to move forward, and the title change is the first step.] (]) 15:49, 24 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:04, 24 September 2009
- (I don't know where the nominator's gone, but anyway:)
Oppose and dispute this AfD process. This nomination is against WP:BEFORE and I believe is an attempt to forum shop. It is against WP:BEFORE because the article is currently under a request for move, which should be closed by an admin any time now (7 days after original posting) - with 11 editors in favour of moving, and two against. (the nominator of this AfD "conditionally" for, although that may be a position borne out of sarcasm). It's forum shopping, as an RfC was called earlier today by one of the other opposed editors, with as yet no impact on the consensus, and not even that has been allowed to run its course. A lot of work has been done to get agreement on how to move forward, and the title change is the first step.VsevolodKrolikov (talk) 15:49, 24 September 2009 (UTC)