| Revision as of 12:45, 26 September 2009 editMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 3 thread(s) (older than 14d) to User talk:Akhilleus/Archive 16.← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:18, 27 September 2009 edit undoOttava Rima (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users20,327 edits →Edit warring: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
| Thanks,<!-- Template:Arbcom notice --> | Thanks,<!-- Template:Arbcom notice --> | ||
| == Edit warring == | |||
| ] (]) 03:18, 27 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:18, 27 September 2009
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Q&A
Am I supposed to post my reply here or on my own Talk Page? Anyway, my reply is currently on my Talk Page. tcob44
Ponte Vecchio
Please see Talk:Ponte_Vecchio#Undoing_the_compromise? ... it has been suggested that the article be returned to a more standard format, as it has been a year since the compromise. Your participation may be helpful. ++Lar: t/c 12:12, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Triple Goddess
Thanks for the 3RR reminder. Also thanks for keeping a sane head and occasionally explaining my points better than I would myself! Davémon (talk) 16:17, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Doubting Thomas Akhilleus
Official recognition that Ottava Rima's behavior has been problematic. Jehochman 13:10, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
- That worked well! --Akhilleus (talk) 15:11, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
ArbCom
You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration#RS and Fringe Noticeboard and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
Thanks,