| Revision as of 20:25, 16 December 2005 editPeter McConaughey (talk | contribs)689 edits This guideline has exactly the same status as the WP:One-revert rule. It is adopted by those editors who agree with it in principle. The guideline tool says that and is consistent with the 1RR← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:28, 16 December 2005 edit undoCarbonite (talk | contribs)4,550 edits {{proposed}} guideline, this is not "generally accepted by consensus to apply in many cases"; it's only been edited by a handful of editor, several of whom don't appear to support itNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{ |
{{proposed}} | ||
| The '''zero-revert rule''' states: | The '''zero-revert rule''' states: | ||
Revision as of 20:28, 16 December 2005
 | The following is a proposed Misplaced Pages policy, guideline, or process. The proposal may still be in development, under discussion, or in the process of gathering consensus for adoption. |
The zero-revert rule states:
- "If anyone makes a change that you don't like, don't revert it. Instead, talk about it on the article talk page or on their user talk page. This excludes vandalism."
This rule is primarily for teams of contributors who want to avoid edit wars and assume good faith.
Team members sign up and are initially considered "members in good standing". Upon detecting a rule violation (i.e., reverting anything instead of discussing the revert), any member in good standing may move the name of the violator to the "Suspended" section. The result of a suspension is that the members who are still in good standing obviously continue to trust each other.
Regaining one's standing is as easy as undoing the revert that merited the suspension and discussing the edit in question.
Category: