Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 09:53, 17 December 2005

Unblock request

Why was this user blocked?! Fire Star & I had determined that his past edits were not truly vandalism! Please read his discussion page to see what actually happened. I totally believed he was blocked unfairly and that this is really just biting inexperienced users without really seeing what actually happened. He hasn't done any editing since then and his only recent contributions was to his own talk page with me and Fire Star. I request that his block be immediately removed! --LifeStar 06:06, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

68.216.187.22 00:33, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Your request to be unblocked has been granted, since the block reason appears to have been a misunderstanding. I apologize for the lengthy delay since your request. // Pathoschild 13:28, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Re:

Thanks.

Haizum 20:29, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Virginia Quarters

I've responded on User talk:Viriditas. --Viriditas 05:05, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

I've left you another response. --Viriditas 05:12, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Please review WP:NOR, WP:V, and WP:CITE. --Viriditas 05:14, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Sorry, but Misplaced Pages does not host original research. See also my message on my talk page. And try to keep it civil (See WP:CIV). Thank you. --Viriditas 05:21, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Hi, again. I've left you another msg. If you know the origin of the rules (such as whether they were invented by a notable individual) or a notable organization that uses them, that might help. Do you happen to remember who posted them on the original site? --Viriditas 05:27, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Hi, please don't spam talk pages. A brief reply is acceptable. I'm logging off for about an hour or so, but I'll return to comment further. In the meantime, please don't keep posting the same msg on my talk page. We've covered the issues for now, and I'll get back to you when I return. You may want to pursue a second opinion from another editor. --Viriditas 05:47, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Hello, again. You may have the name wrong. For example, there may in fact be a reference for what you call "Virginia Quarters" but it probably goes by another, more established name. I'm currently hunting down references for you. Please feel free to help. Once we find the actual name of the quarters variation (and determine that it matches), we can add your text back in. Until that time, please refrain from edit warring. --Viriditas 09:25, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Re: I didn't touch the page since you edited it. Oh, and btw, there are no other names for that variation. "Virginia Quarters" dates back to 2001, at least. The segment will be as verifiable as the others, and it will be reposted.

Haizum, I'm only trying to help. If what you say is true, it will not be added back into the article. I'm working on verifying the rest of the article as well, so your argument is fallacious. Please try to understand Misplaced Pages policies and how Misplaced Pages works before threatening to "repost" material that is not appropriate for our encyclopedia. I am willing to admit that a similar, more notable variation may exist, and if it does, we can salvage your text. Why not help me? Let's work together to improve the article. --Viriditas 09:36, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

False. The segment of the article will be restored, or most of the article will be taken down. In a matter of hours I will have 3rd party links that are as verifiable as the other links in the article. At that point, you will either have to just accept that the segment is verifiable, or remove the other segments that use the same 3rd party website as verification, then you will have to admit that you did not apply your standards fairly (because the Speed Quarters segment was left up the whole time), then I will be forced to report this to those that gave you administrative authority in order to make Misplaced Pages a better place. It's not complicated.' Haizum 09:42, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Hi. I've already verified the rest of the article, and I'm working on adding citations. I have not, however, verified "Virginia Quarters". Please see the task list I've added to the talk page and do a search on any of the variations listed. If they match the rules of what you call "Viriginia Quarters" (and you would have to prove that it does) then you may be in luck. Otherwise, your content will not be added back into the article until it meets basic Misplaced Pages policies. --Viriditas 09:53, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Re:

I haven't been posting "the same message" on any talk page.(See WP:CIV).

Haizum 06:26, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

lol

Why not ask me why i mean? --Striver 08:52, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Legal threats are unacceptable. Do not make them. gren グレン 08:55, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Dont forget to give them the entire list. I dont like when people take things out of context. --Striver 08:57, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Unacceptable

I was not making a personal legal threat. I reported what I saw as a potential crime. It is my civic duty to do so.

I DEMAND TO KNOW WHO BLOCKED ME

I DEMAND THAT MY BLOCK BE LIFTED

Haizum 09:06, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Haizum, you may be happy to know that I'm working on finding a reference for "Virginia Quarters". If you like, you can use your down time to help. I'm fairly certain that if the variation exists, it goes by another name. If I find it, I'll add your text back in. Just thought I should let you know.--Viriditas 09:29, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Re: You would be better off using your time to investigate administrative abuse and absurd allegations that I made a personal legal threat. Haizum 09:31, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

"Legal Threats"

I have reviewed the policy article on legal threats. The entirety of that article discusses personal legal action, not the reporting of a crime.

This situation is no different than me discovering what I believe to be child pornography on a user's page, only to have an administrator ban me for reporting it to the authorities.

I will not tolerate administrative abuse.

If you want to enforce policy, understand that policy.

Haizum 09:14, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Since gren wanted me to explain, ill do: I dont belive there are any conclusive, or even solid evidence suporing the "19 Arabs from a cave" conspiracy theory. At the same time, i see plenty of evidence for a domestic complicity theory. I belive the USA government is hijeck by terrorist. Im not alone in doing so, Bush's former employe Morgan Reynolds agrees that it was a inside job.

i belive they did it un purpose. The plan was outlayd in Operation Northwoods, and in 1999 they proclaimed that they needed a new "pearl harbor" to basicly conquere the world, starting with Iraq, in their PNAC. There they also said, in 1999, that Saddam was a non-issue, they needed Iraq, Saddam or no Saddam. They lied to the entire world, and the world swallowed it, in the same way they swallowd the Gulf of Tonkin Incident crap draging them into the Vietnamn War, or fooling the entire world that a loone nut killed JFK. If you belive nobody knew about the 9/11 attacks, try reading this. , If you belive the Talibans are the bad guys, read this: 1998, 2000 and this .

If you belive USA never lies in order to destroy governments, try reading about Operation Ajax.

Bush is an idiot. But his aproval rating went to 90% after the 9/11 insider job. Due to that, he could accomplish the plan he proposed 8 days after being elected: Invading Iraq. He lied about WMD, and there is plenty of proves for that.

His aproval rating is now down below 45%. Half of Manhatan belives the government is complicit in 9/11 Half of New Yorkers Believe US Leaders Had Foreknowledge of Impending 9-11 Attacks and “Consciously Failed” To Act; 66%

The same guys that made the first 9/11 are all the time alledging that it will happen again, bigger and bader. I belive them, they proved they are capable of it. Just watch and see, the Bush war-hawks will do a new 9/11, this time it will cost the lives of tenths of thousands of incent and good Americans. Then they will blame it on Iran. I personaly belive, in this case withouth evidence, that they are going to kill their own president, Bush, in order to shock the country even more.

Take your time and look through this movie: .

I dont support any "Muslim terrorists". I dont even belive in that word, its a oxymoron. I dont even belive Bin Ladin is alive, i think he died in 2001 when he when to that FBI hospital, just as reported by the france newspapers. Why do you think that Bin Laden al the suden changed his writing hand, got a nose job and gained 10 kilos? How did he manage to get a nose job while alledgedly fleeing American forces?

I dont expect you to belive one single word i wrote, im sure that by now, you are convinced that im ready to be medicated. I could gues that you didnt even bother to read any of the links. I dont care. No you know what i meant. I dont support any terroist at all, may God curse and reject to hell everyone that killed any civilianc.--Striver 09:37, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Ill refrace "better". It was a sarkasm --Striver 09:37, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Hi

I dont know who blocked you, or why. Neither do i care, i have nothing to do with that.

As i said, Ill refrace "better", It was a sarkasm. Ever heard of Freedom of speech? No? Never mind then, Patriot Act 2 will shreed anything that might have survived Patriot Act. Have a good day in the prison that you are creating for yourself, due to irrational fears. --Striver 09:53, 17 December 2005 (UTC)