| Revision as of 03:00, 18 December 2005 view sourceB.Wind (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers15,684 edits →Television programs← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:40, 18 December 2005 view source B.Wind (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers15,684 edits →Musical groupsNext edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| 2. Articles of musical acts must include (at least a partial) lineup for legitimacy. No bandmembers' names mean no notariety. | 2. Articles of musical acts must include (at least a partial) lineup for legitimacy. No bandmembers' names mean no notariety. | ||
| 3. In almost every case, the notability of an up-and-coming group is greater than that of any member in it. The only exceptions are groups that are joined/formed by an established musician. | |||
Revision as of 03:40, 18 December 2005
Sorry about the semi-blank page. Somebody with no self-control decided to vandalize it. I'll work on this page when I have an opportunity to do so.
In the meantime... Hello!
...and would an admin please check the vandalism and the user who decided to pee electronically on this page? Many thanks. B.Wind 01:49, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
PS: Discussions about anything I edited should be directed to my talk page. Many thanks for your understanding.
BW's new rules for AfDs (to be added as they arrive to me)
Television programs
1. If the article of a TV program doesn't indicate where the show was/is broadcast (network, local channel, or syndicated), I shall immediately conclude that the article deserves deletion, regardless of notability of the program.
Musical groups
1. One (or two) sentence articles indicate lack of noteworthiness and should be deleted.
2. Articles of musical acts must include (at least a partial) lineup for legitimacy. No bandmembers' names mean no notariety.
3. In almost every case, the notability of an up-and-coming group is greater than that of any member in it. The only exceptions are groups that are joined/formed by an established musician.