Misplaced Pages

User talk:69.159.84.182: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:17, 11 October 2009 edit64.231.61.51 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 18:21, 11 October 2009 edit undoDaniel Case (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators224,405 edits →WP:AIN: decline unblockNext edit →
Line 26: Line 26:
{{ #if: 31 hour common vandalism block. While some of the edits might be considered accurate the intemperate language shows an intent to disrupt, so therefore the basis of the edits is vandalism. | <p>'''Comments:''' 31 hour common vandalism block. While some of the edits might be considered accurate the intemperate language shows an intent to disrupt, so therefore the basis of the edits is vandalism.}} {{ #if: 31 hour common vandalism block. While some of the edits might be considered accurate the intemperate language shows an intent to disrupt, so therefore the basis of the edits is vandalism. | <p>'''Comments:''' 31 hour common vandalism block. While some of the edits might be considered accurate the intemperate language shows an intent to disrupt, so therefore the basis of the edits is vandalism.}}
|}<!-- Template:Anonblock --> |}<!-- Template:Anonblock -->
⚫ {{unblock reviewed|1=I was blocked on the ostensible basis that my use of "intemperate language" to describe lousy, POV-pushing Misplaced Pages content is is proof of "intent to disrupt."<BR/><BR/>The blocking admin put the following message in his edit summary of the block: "We don't like you very much and think you smell of rotting seaweed."|decline=Intemperate language, which is all over your brief edit history, is ] and blockable enough by itself. The admin's block message was ill-considered and I will speak to him about it, but that has no bearing on the block. — ] (]) 18:21, 11 October 2009 (UTC)}}

⚫ {{unblock|I was blocked on the ostensible basis that my use of "intemperate language" to describe lousy, POV-pushing Misplaced Pages content is is proof of "intent to disrupt."<BR/><BR/>The blocking admin put the following message in his edit summary of the block: "We don't like you very much and think you smell of rotting seaweed."}}

Revision as of 18:21, 11 October 2009

October 2009

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to Rick Santorum, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to Homesteading, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Misplaced Pages, as you did to Rick Santorum, you will be blocked from editing.

Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: Article. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Additional text

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Zero History, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. MuZemike 08:01, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: User talk:Blargh29. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. You cannot call another editor an "incompetent hack"

Constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you.

WP:AIN

I went ahead and reported your behavior to Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Rude language and POV Pushing.--Blargh29 (talk) 08:11, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

LessHeard vanU (talk) 10:51, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

To edit, please log in.

Editing by anonymous users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled. Registered users, however, are still able to edit. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, you may email us using an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network.

In your email, please tell us your preferred username and an account will be created for you. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Comments: 31 hour common vandalism block. While some of the edits might be considered accurate the intemperate language shows an intent to disrupt, so therefore the basis of the edits is vandalism.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.159.84.182 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked on the ostensible basis that my use of "intemperate language" to describe lousy, POV-pushing Misplaced Pages content is is proof of "intent to disrupt."

The blocking admin put the following message in his edit summary of the block: "We don't like you very much and think you smell of rotting seaweed."

Decline reason:

Intemperate language, which is all over your brief edit history, is incivil and blockable enough by itself. The admin's block message was ill-considered and I will speak to him about it, but that has no bearing on the block. — Daniel Case (talk) 18:21, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.