Misplaced Pages

talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Socionics/Evidence: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration | Requests | Case | Socionics Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:51, 11 October 2009 editCarcharoth (talk | contribs)Administrators73,550 edits archive excess evidence to Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Socionics/Evidence/Archive 1← Previous edit Revision as of 21:52, 11 October 2009 edit undoCarcharoth (talk | contribs)Administrators73,550 edits headerNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{RFARcasenav|case name=Socionics|clerk1=MBisanz|clerk2=Lankiveil|draft arb=Carcharoth|draft arb2=}} {{RFARcasenav|case name=Socionics|clerk1=MBisanz|clerk2=Lankiveil|draft arb=Carcharoth|draft arb2=}}

== Note from Rmcnew ==


Just added in all of my evidence. I could add more specific evidence when requested. --] (]) 18:06, 6 October 2009 (UTC) Just added in all of my evidence. I could add more specific evidence when requested. --] (]) 18:06, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:52, 11 October 2009

Main case page (Talk)Evidence (Talk)Workshop (Talk)Proposed decision (Talk)

Case clerks: MBisanz (Talk) & Lankiveil (Talk)Drafting arbitrator: Carcharoth (Talk)

Note from Rmcnew

Just added in all of my evidence. I could add more specific evidence when requested. --Rmcnew (talk) 18:06, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

You guys need to re-read the arbitration pages

Just a bit of advice to the involved parties. Your 'evidence' reads like a lecture and is very soft on evidence. None of you have provided the number one most important thing required for arbitrations and thats DIFFS. Long paragraphs about the other persons bias will get you nowhere if you don't have diffs proving disruption in specific circumstances. Seriously, read the arbitration pages that talk about what you should say and how to say it. Its even in the template.

{Write your assertion here} Place argument and diffs which support your assertion; for example, your first assertion might be "So-and-so engages in edit warring", which should be the title of this section. Here you would show specific edits to specific articles which show So-and-so engaging in edit warring.

For example: Saying 'his entire thesis screams original research' would qualify as an assertion, but it needs to be backed up with difs of specific edits which show this and possibly some words to put the diff into context. Saying 'Observe, he repeatedly attempts to' and then providing the Arbs with nothing to observe won't get you far. Diffs, Diffs, Diffs. 198.161.174.222 (talk) 14:38, 9 October 2009 (UTC)