| Revision as of 13:07, 13 October 2009 editThryduulf (talk | contribs)Oversighters, Administrators98,950 editsm deletion sorting← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:01, 13 October 2009 edit undoDavid.Mestel (talk | contribs)Rollbackers5,396 edits →Lepanto opening: sourcesNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| fails ]. While there is (brief) coverage of the opening it is not enough, particularly since those sources available fail the test of being third-party, reliable and independent. Of the sources I can find one was written in an unreliable 'zine by the ''inventor of the opening'' and the rest are similarly unreliable (player zines that aren't just written by amateurs but, as player magazines, don't really work as evidence of notability). ] (]) 07:32, 13 October 2009 (UTC) | fails ]. While there is (brief) coverage of the opening it is not enough, particularly since those sources available fail the test of being third-party, reliable and independent. Of the sources I can find one was written in an unreliable 'zine by the ''inventor of the opening'' and the rest are similarly unreliable (player zines that aren't just written by amateurs but, as player magazines, don't really work as evidence of notability). ] (]) 07:32, 13 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 13:07, 13 October 2009 (UTC)<!--Template:Delsort--></small> | *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 13:07, 13 October 2009 (UTC)<!--Template:Delsort--></small> | ||
| *Added a few more sources, including a mainstream published book, and articles from ], manufacturers of the game. ]<sup>(])</sup> 20:01, 13 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:01, 13 October 2009
Lepanto opening
- Lepanto opening (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:GNG. While there is (brief) coverage of the opening it is not enough, particularly since those sources available fail the test of being third-party, reliable and independent. Of the sources I can find one was written in an unreliable 'zine by the inventor of the opening and the rest are similarly unreliable (player zines that aren't just written by amateurs but, as player magazines, don't really work as evidence of notability). Ironholds (talk) 07:32, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 13:07, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
- Added a few more sources, including a mainstream published book, and articles from Wizards of the Coast, manufacturers of the game. David 20:01, 13 October 2009 (UTC)