Misplaced Pages

Talk:Tosh.0: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:26, 14 October 2009 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,318 editsm Signing comment by 96.238.100.182 - ""← Previous edit Revision as of 05:12, 7 January 2010 edit undoIarann (talk | contribs)129 edits →In the style of...: new sectionNext edit →
Line 12: Line 12:


I think we need several more "no sources" banners on this page. I didn't notice till... <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 01:25, 14 October 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> I think we need several more "no sources" banners on this page. I didn't notice till... <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 01:25, 14 October 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== In the style of... ==

Currently the page states "In the style of ]. This seems a bit inacurate considering ] was developed completely independently and actually started days after Tosh.0? You could argue it's in the style of the original Soup show, or that around the net segment of ], but considering it started before and has signifigantly higher ratings than ], the description seems wrong. If no one objects, I'll change it.

Revision as of 05:12, 7 January 2010

Articles for deletionThis article was nominated for deletion on 14 August 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.
WikiProject iconComedy Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconTelevision Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Misplaced Pages articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I don't think it links to the right Mike Gibbons. That is, unless zombies are allowed to be executive producers nowadays. --76.117.110.236 (talk) 06:47, 13 August 2009 (UTC) 

    I would have to agree, i have removed the link  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.71.42.117 (talk) 05:13, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

I think we need several more "no sources" banners on this page. I didn't notice till... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.238.100.182 (talk) 01:25, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

In the style of...

Currently the page states "In the style of Web Soup. This seems a bit inacurate considering Web Soup was developed completely independently and actually started days after Tosh.0? You could argue it's in the style of the original Soup show, or that around the net segment of Attack of the Show, but considering it started before and has signifigantly higher ratings than Web Soup, the description seems wrong. If no one objects, I'll change it.

Categories: