| Revision as of 18:46, 27 September 2002 edit209.19.160.132 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:00, 28 September 2002 edit undo198.81.17.174 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| '''Oligarchy''' is a form of ] where most political power is effectively vested in a small segment of society (typically the wealthiest or most ruthless segment). Oligarchies are often controlled by a few powerful families |
'''Oligarchy''' is a form of ] where most political power is effectively vested in a small segment of society (typically the wealthiest or most ruthless segment). Oligarchies are often controlled by a few powerful families raised and mentored to become inheritors of the power of the oligarchy, often at some sort of expense to those governed. This power may not always be exercised openly, the oligarchs preferring to remain "the power behind the throne," exerting control through ] means. It has also been suggested that most so-called ] countries fit the definition of oligarchy, in that the most ruthless segment of society comes to power by overthrowing other oligarchs (usually and historically: ]s). | ||
| A society may become an oligarchy by default as an outgrowth of the shifting alliances of warring tribal chieftans, although any form of government may transform into an oligarchy at some point in its evolution. The most likely mechanism for this transformation is a gradual accumulation of otherwise unchecked economic power. Oligarchies may also evolve into more authoritarian forms of government, sometimes as the result of one family gaining asendency over the others. Many of the ]an monarchies established during the late ] began in this manner. | |||
| Oligarchies may also become instruments of transformation, insisting that monarchs or dictators share power, thereby opening the door to power-sharing by other elements of society. One example of this process occurred when ] nobles banded together in ] to force a reluctant King ] to sign the ], a tacit recognition both of King John's waning political power and of the existence of an incipient oligarchy. As English society continued to grow and develop, the Magna Carta was repeatedly revised (],], and ]), guaranteeing greater rights to greater numbers of people, thus setting the stage for ] ]. | |||
| A modern example of oligarchy can be seen in ] during the ]. Here, the basic characteristics of oligarchy are particularly easy to observe, since the South African form of oligarchy was based on ]. After the ], a tacit agreement was reached between English- and Afrikaans-speaking whites. Together, they made up about twenty percent of the population, but this small percentage had access to virtually all the educational and trade opportunities, and they proceeded to deny this to the black majority even further than before. Although this process had been going on since the mid-], after ] it became official government policy and became known worldwide as ]. Even since the advent of democracy in South Africa in ] and the handover of political power to a black government, whites have largely maintained their hold on economic power, sharing this only with a small group of blacks. | |||
| See also: ], ], ], ], ], ] | |||
Revision as of 01:00, 28 September 2002
Oligarchy is a form of government where most political power is effectively vested in a small segment of society (typically the wealthiest or most ruthless segment). Oligarchies are often controlled by a few powerful families raised and mentored to become inheritors of the power of the oligarchy, often at some sort of expense to those governed. This power may not always be exercised openly, the oligarchs preferring to remain "the power behind the throne," exerting control through economic means. It has also been suggested that most so-called communist countries fit the definition of oligarchy, in that the most ruthless segment of society comes to power by overthrowing other oligarchs (usually and historically: capitalists).