Misplaced Pages

talk:Revert only when necessary: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:15, 20 December 2005 editRadiant! (talk | contribs)36,918 edits good, merge it← Previous edit Revision as of 03:25, 20 December 2005 edit undoCarbonite (talk | contribs)4,550 edits mergingNext edit →
Line 4: Line 4:


*Good page, but please merge/redirect in from 0RR, 1RR and Misplaced Pages:Revert. ]]] 03:15, 20 December 2005 (UTC) *Good page, but please merge/redirect in from 0RR, 1RR and Misplaced Pages:Revert. ]]] 03:15, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

**I'm going to redirect the 1RR very soon. Hopefully the 0RR can also be merged and redirected soon. I think that ] needs to remain though, since it has info on the mechanics of a revert, something this page doesn't and shouldn't cover. The sections I took from that page can probably be removed though and replaced with a link to this page. ] | ] 03:25, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:25, 20 December 2005

You haven't summarised it in a one-liner yet. Stevage 03:09, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm still trying to come up with some concise, yet meaningful wording. Any suggestions? Carbonite | Talk 03:11, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
    • I'm going to redirect the 1RR very soon. Hopefully the 0RR can also be merged and redirected soon. I think that Misplaced Pages:Revert needs to remain though, since it has info on the mechanics of a revert, something this page doesn't and shouldn't cover. The sections I took from that page can probably be removed though and replaced with a link to this page. Carbonite | Talk 03:25, 20 December 2005 (UTC)