Revision as of 21:01, 18 October 2009 editJujutacular (talk | contribs)19,031 edits re← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:13, 19 October 2009 edit undoSussexonian (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,159 edits →How now brown cowNext edit → | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*'''Comment:''' I don't really like the idea of merging to ]. Ideally, this should be part of an article on teaching elocution, as it's probably one of the two most iconic English elocution drills. (The other is ].) I'm not sure if ] itself should be the article to covers such drills.--] (]) 07:31, 18 October 2009 (UTC) | *'''Comment:''' I don't really like the idea of merging to ]. Ideally, this should be part of an article on teaching elocution, as it's probably one of the two most iconic English elocution drills. (The other is ].) I'm not sure if ] itself should be the article to covers such drills.--] (]) 07:31, 18 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
:*So if you don't think it should go in ] or ], where ''should'' it go? ''']''' <sup>] · ]</sup> 21:01, 18 October 2009 (UTC) | :*So if you don't think it should go in ] or ], where ''should'' it go? ''']''' <sup>] · ]</sup> 21:01, 18 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
::] looks like a possible candidate, but all the linguistics articles are rather too scholarly to accommodate these examples easily. ] (]) 00:13, 19 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small><small>—] (]) 07:35, 18 October 2009 (UTC)</small> | *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small><small>—] (]) 07:35, 18 October 2009 (UTC)</small> |
Revision as of 00:13, 19 October 2009
How now brown cow
AfDs for this article:- How now brown cow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable phrase. — Dædαlus 06:12, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- Merge with Roundedness. Useful information, but doesn't warrant a separate article. Jujutacular 06:41, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- Merge with above suggestion and logic. Certainly has a place in a proper collection of similar phrases or at least a list. Datheisen (talk) 07:29, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- Comment: I don't really like the idea of merging to roundedness. Ideally, this should be part of an article on teaching elocution, as it's probably one of the two most iconic English elocution drills. (The other is The Rain in Spain.) I'm not sure if elocution itself should be the article to covers such drills.--Chris Johnson (talk) 07:31, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- So if you don't think it should go in roundedness or elocution, where should it go? Jujutacular 21:01, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- Accent reduction looks like a possible candidate, but all the linguistics articles are rather too scholarly to accommodate these examples easily. Sussexonian (talk) 00:13, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. —Chris Johnson (talk) 07:35, 18 October 2009 (UTC)