| Revision as of 09:47, 19 October 2009 editStifle (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators83,973 edits image review - pass← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:55, 23 October 2009 edit undoDabomb87 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users66,457 edits dead linkNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| This article—about a fascinating, strange, and controversial film—has been carefully researched and been through a couple copyedits. I feel it meets all the FA criteria. <b class="Unicode">]</b> <small><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></small> 02:31, 19 October 2009 (UTC) | This article—about a fascinating, strange, and controversial film—has been carefully researched and been through a couple copyedits. I feel it meets all the FA criteria. <b class="Unicode">]</b> <small><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></small> 02:31, 19 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Image copyright review''': All OK. ] (]) 09:47, 19 October 2009 (UTC) | *'''Image copyright review''': All OK. ] (]) 09:47, 19 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
| '''Comment''' The toolbox reveals a dead link. ] (]) 22:55, 23 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:55, 23 October 2009
Not One Less
- Nominator(s): rʨanaɢ /contribs 02:31, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
| Toolbox |
|---|
This article—about a fascinating, strange, and controversial film—has been carefully researched and been through a couple copyedits. I feel it meets all the FA criteria. rʨanaɢ /contribs 02:31, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- Image copyright review: All OK. Stifle (talk) 09:47, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
Comment The toolbox reveals a dead link. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:55, 23 October 2009 (UTC)