Revision as of 04:15, 24 October 2009 editDabomb87 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users66,457 edits re← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:24, 25 October 2009 edit undoEaldgyth (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators152,948 edits comments, sources look okay, all done!Next edit → | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:I saw that too, but when you actually try it's fine. This is not the first time I've noticed the toolbox incorrectly marking links as dead; I don't know how exactly that tool works, so I'm not sure would could be causing it. <b class="Unicode">]</b> <small><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></small> 23:16, 23 October 2009 (UTC) | :I saw that too, but when you actually try it's fine. This is not the first time I've noticed the toolbox incorrectly marking links as dead; I don't know how exactly that tool works, so I'm not sure would could be causing it. <b class="Unicode">]</b> <small><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></small> 23:16, 23 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
::I know that when I clicked on it the first time it was dead. However, it seems to have fixed itself. Sorry for the false alarm. ] (]) 04:15, 24 October 2009 (UTC) | ::I know that when I clicked on it the first time it was dead. However, it seems to have fixed itself. Sorry for the false alarm. ] (]) 04:15, 24 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
* '''Comments''' - sources look okay, links checked out with the link checker tool. ] - ] 17:24, 25 October 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:24, 25 October 2009
Not One Less
- Nominator(s): rʨanaɢ /contribs 02:31, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
Toolbox |
---|
This article—about a fascinating, strange, and controversial film—has been carefully researched and been through a couple copyedits. I feel it meets all the FA criteria. rʨanaɢ /contribs 02:31, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- Image copyright review: All OK. Stifle (talk) 09:47, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
Comment The toolbox reveals a dead link. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:55, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
- I saw that too, but when you actually try the link it's fine. This is not the first time I've noticed the toolbox incorrectly marking links as dead; I don't know how exactly that tool works, so I'm not sure would could be causing it. rʨanaɢ /contribs 23:16, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
- I know that when I clicked on it the first time it was dead. However, it seems to have fixed itself. Sorry for the false alarm. Dabomb87 (talk) 04:15, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
- Comments - sources look okay, links checked out with the link checker tool. Ealdgyth - Talk 17:24, 25 October 2009 (UTC)