Misplaced Pages

:Featured article candidates/Not One Less/archive1: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:24, 25 October 2009 editEaldgyth (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators152,982 edits comments, sources look okay, all done!← Previous edit Revision as of 22:20, 2 November 2009 edit undoMattisse (talk | contribs)78,542 edits Not One Less: commentNext edit →
Line 13: Line 13:


* '''Comments''' - sources look okay, links checked out with the link checker tool. ] - ] 17:24, 25 October 2009 (UTC) * '''Comments''' - sources look okay, links checked out with the link checker tool. ] - ] 17:24, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

* '''Comments''' Very interesting article. The quotations in this sentence are not directly referenced: Zhang accused the festival of not being motivated by artistic concerns, and criticized the Western perception that all Chinese films must be either "pro-government" or "anti-government", referring to it as a "discrimination against Chinese films". —] (]) 22:20, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:20, 2 November 2009

Not One Less

Nominator(s): rʨanaɢ /contribs 02:31, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
Toolbox

This article—about a fascinating, strange, and controversial film—has been carefully researched and been through a couple copyedits. I feel it meets all the FA criteria. rʨanaɢ /contribs 02:31, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Comment The toolbox reveals a dead link. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:55, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

I saw that too, but when you actually try the link it's fine. This is not the first time I've noticed the toolbox incorrectly marking links as dead; I don't know how exactly that tool works, so I'm not sure would could be causing it. rʨanaɢ /contribs 23:16, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
I know that when I clicked on it the first time it was dead. However, it seems to have fixed itself. Sorry for the false alarm. Dabomb87 (talk) 04:15, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Comments Very interesting article. The quotations in this sentence are not directly referenced: Zhang accused the festival of not being motivated by artistic concerns, and criticized the Western perception that all Chinese films must be either "pro-government" or "anti-government", referring to it as a "discrimination against Chinese films". —mattisse (Talk) 22:20, 2 November 2009 (UTC)