Revision as of 02:59, 1 November 2009 view sourceEnigmaman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers41,744 edits →{{la|Leona Lewis}}: done← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:01, 1 November 2009 view source Tedder (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators62,266 edits →{{la|Battle of Konotop}}: full, 10 hours, 3RR warningsNext edit → | ||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
I second a protection of the article on . — ] (]) 01:11, 1 November 2009 (UTC) | I second a protection of the article on . — ] (]) 01:11, 1 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
:{{rfpp|f|10 hours}} Chamal and I are both dealing with this (oops), but I (), issued 3RR warnings to three others (Hillock65, Glebchik, HenrichB), and full-protected the article for 10 hours. I was going to go longer, but it's obvious most or all of these editors know about 3RR and about ]. Further reverts will result in blocks. ] (]) 03:01, 1 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
===={{la|Wasp}}==== | ===={{la|Wasp}}==== |
Revision as of 03:01, 1 November 2009
"WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Misplaced Pages:Requests for permissions, Misplaced Pages:Requesting copyright permission, or Misplaced Pages:Random page patrol.Noticeboards | |
---|---|
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes. | |
General | |
Articles and content | |
Page handling | |
User conduct | |
Other | |
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards |
Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here. | ||
---|---|---|
Shortcuts
Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection Request a specific edit to a protected page Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Request edit |
Archives |
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 |
Current requests for protection
Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Saw VI (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi protection. Repeated IP vandalism. — HelloAnnyong 02:45, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--RegentsPark (sticks and stones) 02:53, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Toy Story 3 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Temporary Semi-protection - Way to many unsorced changes made by IPs. I say semi-protect the page for a month. Rowdy the Ant talk to Rowdy 01:55, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
La Cumparsita (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protection. Persistent vandalism. McSly (talk) 01:46, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Leona Lewis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protection vandalism, protection expired on 29th; vandalism has resumed. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 00:57, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigma 02:59, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Battle of Konotop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Temporary full-protection intermittent edit warring. Admins' involvement/participation will be appreciated. --Hillock65 (talk) 00:40, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
I second a protection of the article on this version. — Glebchik (talk) 01:11, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 10 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chamal and I are both dealing with this (oops), but I (blocked one user), issued 3RR warnings to three others (Hillock65, Glebchik, HenrichB), and full-protected the article for 10 hours. I was going to go longer, but it's obvious most or all of these editors know about 3RR and about ways to handle disputes. Further reverts will result in blocks. tedder (talk) 03:01, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Wasp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Recent wave of IP vandalism on the Wasp page. Jupiter.solarsyst.comm.arm.milk.universe 00:27, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. tedder (talk) 02:52, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Roe v. Wade (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protection requested due to persistent vandalism for months. It seems to draw anon IP edits. Jeff Carr (talk) 23:25, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Level of vandalism isn't high, but the article is stable and there are little/no positive IP contributions. tedder (talk) 23:30, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Don't Forget (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Temporary semi-protection, IP editors insist on removing sourced genres and replacing them with their own original research fan fluff. Has gone on for awhile. Chase wc 23:09, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. tedder (talk) 23:32, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Trust metric (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protection requested due to persistent disruptive editing and general incivility by 'anonymous' IP editor (actually Misplaced Pages editor in disguise). J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 22:21, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
- Non-admin comment - That page has been edited all of ten times this month, and might I remind you it is the 31 (Happy Hallowe'en). The disruptive user can be blocked; however, there is very little recent activity. Intelligentsium 22:29, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. JamieS93 23:01, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Sinitta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Temporary semi-protection vandalism, The idiots are back and vandalising this article as much as ever. They keep changing the date of birth to make her seem implausibly young or old. They seem to find this inexplicably amusing. It was semi-protected for a few days and that hasn't helped. Maybe a longer period is appropriate this time. DanielRigal (talk) 21:18, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:28, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Trick-or-treating (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Temporary full protection vandalism, Happy haloween. (there's been a bunch of vandalism, you can guess why). Tim1357 (talk) 20:51, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. now gimme some candy or I'll egg your house! Beeblebrox (talk) 21:26, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
User talk:MattMKelley (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)
Protect against self-vandalism Disruptive blocked account. 99.149.84.135 (talk) 20:27, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
- Declined – User talk pages are not protected except in response to severe or continued vandalism. If he wants to talk to himself let him, he's not currently doing anything particularly disruptive. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:30, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protection vandalism, Repeated addition of uncited content by IP hopping vandal, blocking each IP they go onto would be impractical. treelo radda 20:21, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:22, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
I Am... Sasha Fierce (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protect. High levels of IP vandalism from edits. Sales figures keep being changed without changing sources. (Lil-unique1 (talk) 19:58, 31 October 2009 (UTC))
- Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NW (Talk) 21:35, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Hobo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism. Pikiwyn 19:44, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Was bad a few days ago, but not today. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:18, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Timbaland Presents Shock Value 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Temporary Semi-protection,IP vandalism for an extended period because IPs keep adding unsourced content. One IP today removed a source whilst other IPs have been involved in changing sourced content too. (Lil-unique1 (talk) 19:40, 31 October 2009 (UTC))
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Suggest you brush up on the protection policy. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:15, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Love? (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Temporary semi-protection, Ip Vandalism over the last couple of days there has been quite a few edits adding unsourced content. (Lil-unique1 (talk) 19:40, 31 October 2009 (UTC))
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:14, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Current requests for unprotection
ShortcutsBefore posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Parina (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
The deletion log suggests that this page was deleted and protected when it covered a non-notable person. But it's supposed to cover a seasonal river in Italy, the it:Parina. I will make it a stub like it's neighbor, the Stabina. ~YellowFives 13:53, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
- Unprotected. JamieS93 14:38, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you, Jamie. ~YellowFives 15:54, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
ShortcutIdeally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Misplaced Pages:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Misplaced Pages:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
User:Chaser/monobook.js (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Please undo the last edit to this page so I can get off wikibreak. I need access to my main account to vote in the audit committee elections. Thanks.--Chaser2 (talk) 01:24, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
- Done That page isn't protected. I assume the date keeps you from doing ANYTHING, eh? tedder (talk) 07:13, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Fulfilled/denied requests
Jon Gosselin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Temporary semi-protection vandalism, A lot of IP vandalism in the last two days, including someone posting what purports to be a phone number. Blueboy96 18:56, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NW (Talk) 19:05, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Redneck (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protect. High level of IP disruption, sockpuppetry. Reported to no avail at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Eastcote (talk) 18:01, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Blueboy96 19:05, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Sugababes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi protection, ip vandalism changing the release date to 2010 even though there is no official confirmation to support this and even though previous release dates include official sources from the band's website. Also requesting protection for the album's page Sweet 7 for the same reason. (Lil-unique1 (talk) 21:54, 30 October 2009 (UTC))
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NW (Talk) 19:09, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Georgia (U.S. state) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Protect that page now because in the revision history page there was another user who had to edit but the user talk edit it again there was too much edits. Please protect that page please. So no one will edit it there is too much edits when I went to the revision history page. 75.141.100.115 75.141.100.115 18:46, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I will ask you again to try and make a little more sense when filing requests here. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:51, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
- (EC, I also would decline) I'm starting to get the impression you're subtly trolling us given the nature of your RFPP requests. First you request unprotection of the user page of a known Jarlaxle target, and then you ask for unprotection of an article whose semi-protection is already being circumvented. Now you're asking for a redirect with nary 15 edits to be protected because there's too many edits?! Go buzz, you're wasting our time! -Jeremy 18:53, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Germany (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Full protected in September 16, 2009 can you unprotect it please because it was protected for 45 days please unprotect that article. 75.141.100.115 75.141.100.115 18:39, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
- Declined I see sleepers. -Jeremy 18:47, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Romeo and Juliet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism. Pikiwyn 17:09, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Given the long history of this page being vandalized, I went long. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:37, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
The Pirate Bay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protection vandalism, anons keep making unsourced changes to the "current status" of the website, despite hidden comments not to do so. UltraMagnus 16:54, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:33, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Marek Edelman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Full-protect. Content dispute / edit warring and two parties aren't engaging in a corresponding discussion on the talk page. Thanks, —Ed (talk • contribs) 16:05, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --RegentsPark (sticks and stones) 16:15, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
User:Spongefrog (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection- the user is recieving heavy abuse and personal harassment on their page from an IP hopping vandal. Routerone (talk) 12:27, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Kyle Eckel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Full protected in December 2008, downgraded to semi in January. No activity in terms of vandalism from vandalism only accounts. Attempted to contact original protecter here, but have yet to receive response.--Giants27(Contribs|WP:CFL) 14:24, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
- Unprotected. It's been semi-protected for long enough, so I've lifted it and we'll see how it goes. It can always be semi-protected again if vandalism/BLP problems recur. JamieS93 14:34, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
2009 World Series (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Temporary semi-protection vandalism, High level of ip vandalism. Richard (talk) 09:12, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 09:21, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
2009 in heavy metal music (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Page locked with the reasoning of “disruptive edits”.
Care to point me to the disruptive edits? 86.129.208.191 (talk) 16:42, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
- Not unprotected WP:SOCK tedder (talk) 17:46, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
User talk:J.delanoy (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Excessive vandalism by socks. Dr.K. logos 05:24, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
- I blocked all the socks I could find, and rangeblocked him for a short time. J.delanoyadds 05:25, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
- Great. Let's hope it stops them. Thanks. Dr.K. logos 05:28, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
- Declined I'm assuming Jdelanoy will protect it if he wants :-) tedder (talk) 05:34, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Church of Scientology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi protection, due to multiple-IP vandalism. Duration request: Admin's discretion -K10wnsta (talk) 05:31, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. tedder (talk) 05:35, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Talk:S****horpe Problem (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)
Create protect; also Talk:Shorpe Problem. Twice deleted, thrice created implausible redirects. Same as Talk:Shorpe, Talk:S****horpe, Talk:Shorpe problem, and Talk:S****horpe problem, which have all been salted. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 03:25, 31 October 2009 (UTC)