| Revision as of 14:52, 2 November 2009 editXymmax (talk | contribs)Administrators12,138 edits templates← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:04, 2 November 2009 edit undoXymmax (talk | contribs)Administrators12,138 edits →Better get this shaped up: Re removal of the juveniles' namesNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| :Why is this a standalone article, rather than being merged into ]? ] (]) 18:53, 1 November 2009 (UTC) | :Why is this a standalone article, rather than being merged into ]? ] (]) 18:53, 1 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ::Incidents like that shouldn't be merged in with an article about the school itself. For example, ] doesn't mention the shooting on its campus on its article, on in the template, because it has no relevance to the school itself. ] (]) 19:56, 1 November 2009 (UTC) | ::Incidents like that shouldn't be merged in with an article about the school itself. For example, ] doesn't mention the shooting on its campus on its article, on in the template, because it has no relevance to the school itself. ] (]) 19:56, 1 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :::I'm not crazy about this article, but I think that the incident is notable enough to qualify under ]. I have made a few changes to be conservative in the treatment here, the biggest of which is commenting out the names of the juvenile defendents. The school article does not mention their names, and juveniles's names often are not reported. However, quite clearly reliable sources have published the names. Because I want to at least have the issue of whether to list the names discussed, I have placed comment tags around their names for now. If there is consensus to include, them, the information is still there in the source text. ] ] ] 15:04, 2 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:04, 2 November 2009
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2009 Richmond High School gang rape article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: Index, 1 |
Help
Help with the article! Currently working on this, and I would like all to help with it. it's a big case that's gotten america's attention. Cyanidethistles (talk) 17:07, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Title
Richmond rape incident?? Pretty awful title.
Better get this shaped up
It's only a matter of time before someone comes along and wants to delete this article. So get it in good condition and make it noteworthy Justforasecond (talk) 18:39, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
- Why is this a standalone article, rather than being merged into Richmond High School (Richmond, California)#Crime? tedder (talk) 18:53, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
- Incidents like that shouldn't be merged in with an article about the school itself. For example, Virginia Tech doesn't mention the shooting on its campus on its article, on in the template, because it has no relevance to the school itself. Cyanidethistles (talk) 19:56, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not crazy about this article, but I think that the incident is notable enough to qualify under WP:NCA. I have made a few changes to be conservative in the treatment here, the biggest of which is commenting out the names of the juvenile defendents. The school article does not mention their names, and juveniles's names often are not reported. However, quite clearly reliable sources have published the names. Because I want to at least have the issue of whether to list the names discussed, I have placed comment tags around their names for now. If there is consensus to include, them, the information is still there in the source text. Xymmax So let it be done 15:04, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
- Incidents like that shouldn't be merged in with an article about the school itself. For example, Virginia Tech doesn't mention the shooting on its campus on its article, on in the template, because it has no relevance to the school itself. Cyanidethistles (talk) 19:56, 1 November 2009 (UTC)