Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Tjampuhan Hotel: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:26, 10 November 2009 editMerbabu (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers59,547 edits Tjampuhan Hotel: .← Previous edit Revision as of 13:29, 10 November 2009 edit undoJack Merridew (talk | contribs)34,837 edits keep ;Next edit →
Line 21: Line 21:
: what happened to significant coverage test as per ]? otherwise we'd be creating billions of articles with one clear source. ] (]) 11:52, 10 November 2009 (UTC) : what happened to significant coverage test as per ]? otherwise we'd be creating billions of articles with one clear source. ] (]) 11:52, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. are some more sources documenting the Spies connection. ] (]) 09:13, 10 November 2009 (UTC) *'''Keep'''. are some more sources documenting the Spies connection. ] (]) 09:13, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
* '''Keep''', quite notable; historic, even. You can say in Spies' house. Beware the monitor lizards down by the river. Sincerely, ] 13:29, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:29, 10 November 2009

Tjampuhan Hotel

Tjampuhan Hotel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:CORP. no real third party coverage LibStar (talk) 01:40, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Oppose, hotel is mentioned in literature and should be expanded. Gryffindor (talk) 21:15, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
please provide evidence of how it meets WP:CORP. LibStar (talk) 22:58, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Is WP:CORP the sole criteria for consideration? --Merbabu (talk) 03:13, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
feel free to show if it meets WP:N or WP:GNG. LibStar (talk) 05:36, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
See below, and the article now that the Spies connection has been inserted. --Merbabu (talk) 12:25, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 02:03, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
  • The fact that Walter Spies had a home here does not automatically make it notable (see WP:INHERIT). Here is a gbook link to the book you mentioned: . It shows the first page of the chapter. It certainly looks significant, but our guidelines say we prefer multiple sources. From looking at the book, I suspect more sources exist, and I encourage anyone else that knows of any sources to post them. Jujutacular  03:39, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
what happened to significant coverage test as per WP:GNG? otherwise we'd be creating billions of articles with one clear source. LibStar (talk) 11:52, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Categories: