Revision as of 04:33, 24 December 2005 editJpgordon (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Administrators82,320 editsNo edit summary | Revision as of 16:51, 28 December 2005 edit undoGuettarda (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators63,420 edits agree with jpgordonNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'd like to see this arbitration case examine the actions of ]. A very strong case can be made that these have constituted harassment. --]] 04:33, 24 December 2005 (UTC) | I'd like to see this arbitration case examine the actions of ]. A very strong case can be made that these have constituted harassment. --]] 04:33, 24 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
:I would like to endorse the request. JFAS appears to have pursued a vendetta against deeceevoice and has also harrassed users who supported deeceevoice in her RFC. ] 16:51, 28 December 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:51, 28 December 2005
I'd like to see this arbitration case examine the actions of User:Justforasecond. A very strong case can be made that these have constituted harassment. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 04:33, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
- I would like to endorse the request. JFAS appears to have pursued a vendetta against deeceevoice and has also harrassed users who supported deeceevoice in her RFC. Guettarda 16:51, 28 December 2005 (UTC)