Misplaced Pages

:Good article nominations: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:40, 24 December 2005 view sourceTariqabjotu (talk | contribs)Administrators36,354 edits mosque article← Previous edit Revision as of 18:14, 24 December 2005 view source Linas (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled25,539 edits →Self-nominations: me too!Next edit →
Line 18: Line 18:
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ]
* ''your addition here'' * ''your addition here''

Revision as of 18:14, 24 December 2005

Misplaced Pages:Good articles is an unbureaucratic system to arrive at a quick consensus set of good articles: everyone can nominate good articles, and everyone has veto power. Self-nominations are frowned upon; that's what this list is for.

Instructions

For self-nominators

If you have contributed significantly to an article you believe to be good, list it below under "Self-nominations". You are done.

For all others

If you see an article below under "Self-nominations" that you haven't significantly contributed to and that you consider to be good, remove it from the list, add {{GA}} to its talk page, and list it on Misplaced Pages:Good articles.

If you see an article below under "Self-nominations" that you don't consider to be good, simply remove it from the list. It might be polite to give a reason in your edit summary.

Self-nominations