| Revision as of 22:22, 25 December 2005 editGraemeL (talk | contribs)35,298 edits →Date Links: Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:23, 25 December 2005 edit undoGraemeL (talk | contribs)35,298 editsm →Date Links: Indent a little moreNext edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| :Pretty much correct. Personally (it's not a policy), I usually link the 1st incidence of any individual year in an article if I think it's relevant. This helps people if they're researching timelines rather than specific subjects. After the 1st link, I don't link them again in the same article. Months, I wouldn't link unless it was an article discussing dates. Not acually sure what the policy is on dates without years as the software will format them to user preferences if they're linked. | :Pretty much correct. Personally (it's not a policy), I usually link the 1st incidence of any individual year in an article if I think it's relevant. This helps people if they're researching timelines rather than specific subjects. After the 1st link, I don't link them again in the same article. Months, I wouldn't link unless it was an article discussing dates. Not acually sure what the policy is on dates without years as the software will format them to user preferences if they're linked. | ||
| :Getting into an edit war over date formats with somebody is something you should avoid. Changing them for the sake of changing them could be interpreted as disruption in the same manner as English/American spelling changes are. Anyway, now you know that the software formats linked full dates, I'll leave you to it. --] ] 22:22, 25 December 2005 (UTC) | ::Getting into an edit war over date formats with somebody is something you should avoid. Changing them for the sake of changing them could be interpreted as disruption in the same manner as English/American spelling changes are. Anyway, now you know that the software formats linked full dates, I'll leave you to it. --] ] 22:22, 25 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:23, 25 December 2005
Welcome
Hope you enjoy contributing to Misplaced Pages. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful:
- Try the Tutorial. If you have less time, try Misplaced Pages:How to edit a page.
- To sign your posts (on talk pages, Votes for deletion page etc.) use ~~~~ (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes).
- You can experiment in the test area.
- You can get help at the Help Desk
- Some other pages that will help you know more about Misplaced Pages: Manual of Style and Misplaced Pages:Five pillars, Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view, Misplaced Pages:Civility, Misplaced Pages:What Misplaced Pages is not, Misplaced Pages:How to write a great article
Welcome!! --Gurubrahma 19:20, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
Date links
Please don't remove the link markup around dates. Linking of dates has a special function. When linked, they get formatted in the manner set in user preferences. When not linked, they just display as they were entered. See Misplaced Pages:Manual of Style (dates and numbers) for more information. --GraemeL 19:05, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
Date Links
From what I see in the Manual of Style, we should not be linking 'years', when standing alone; 'months', when standing alone; or 'months with days', when the 'year' is not present. Correct? Hmains 22:10, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
- Pretty much correct. Personally (it's not a policy), I usually link the 1st incidence of any individual year in an article if I think it's relevant. This helps people if they're researching timelines rather than specific subjects. After the 1st link, I don't link them again in the same article. Months, I wouldn't link unless it was an article discussing dates. Not acually sure what the policy is on dates without years as the software will format them to user preferences if they're linked.
- Getting into an edit war over date formats with somebody is something you should avoid. Changing them for the sake of changing them could be interpreted as disruption in the same manner as English/American spelling changes are. Anyway, now you know that the software formats linked full dates, I'll leave you to it. --GraemeL 22:22, 25 December 2005 (UTC)