Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 03:00, 4 December 2009

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Keegscee, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Abecedare (talk) 04:52, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

You really missed the point of my edit. I wasn't vandalizing, but you, however, are clearly biased against religion. You just confirmed my suspicions of Misplaced Pages.

How do you mark something as objectionable? Like, how do you get the little warning to appear at the top of the page saying "the neutrality of this article is disputed"?

Vandalism warnings

It's good that you are helping remove vandalism from wikipedia. However we need to be civil to editors even if they are vandalizing articles, and it is inappropriate to abuse them as you have been doing recently (, etc). Instead, you should use the standardized user warning templates, which are listed at Misplaced Pages:UTM, and which inform the editor why their edit is wrong and try to direct them towards more productive editing. Abecedare (talk) 19:35, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Well, I see I am not the first to take issue with your implimentation of Misplaced Pages policy. I will be monitoring your account and shall request the appropriate action as and when it should be necessary. In the meantime you might consider taking a break from what seems to be a misguided quest. 84.81.177.148 (talk) 07:31, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Ignore the IP address. He seems to like attacking people. --Thejadefalcon_{The bird's seeds} 11:39, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Please do not encourage vandalism in your warnings by suggesting that users attack another website. Your comments on contributors to other websites are personal opinion and constitute direct attacks, which take very seriously and do not accept here. This warning is fine, but there are a number that are unacceptable (, , etc.). I appreciate you may be trying to add humour to warnings, but I must agree with User:Abecedare and request that for the time-being you use our standard user template messages. Fribbulus Xax (talk) 19:15, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

November 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did with this edit to the page User talk:165.155.200.81. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Marek.69 19:16, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Hello

Ok sorry, new to making pages. That one website is n00bish I hate consverpedia or whatever it is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Beatlefan97 (talk • contribs) 06:47, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

OK, bub

Ok, stop putting words in my mouth I never said I hated gays and yes i'm pro-life and if you like killing babies then you can go ahead and ban me because your a evil demon if you think its ok to kill babies, jerk. Your a n00b. Chill its thanksgiving. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Beatlefan97 (talk • contribs) 06:51, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Now we're even

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. I just took care of some on yours. Now we're even. Keep up the good work! --Mpdelbuono (talk) 06:58, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

No problem! Keegscee (talk) 07:00, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

vandalism warnings

please use the proper vandalism-templates: {{sust:uw-vandalism}} Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 07:19, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Warnings

Hey there. Although I find this to be amusing in the extreme, I'd strongly advise you to stick to the default warning templates. It means a lot less trouble all around, especially since the argument could be made that a vandal reported to AIV wasn't "sufficiently warned" because you decided to "customise" yours (in the extreme). Encouraging others to vandalise wikis, regardless of whether it's WP or not, just isn't a good idea. SMC (talk) 07:29, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I understand. I'll just warn normally, as boring as that is. Thanks. Keegscee (talk) 07:31, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Cheers. Keep up the great anti-vandalism work! :) SMC (talk) 07:44, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Abuse reporting

I left you a response at my talk page. As a matter of fact, telecommunication companies and other backbone ISPs are often just as responsive as schools, and so are employers. PCHS-NJROTC 23:43, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Also, vandalizing any Wiki is abuse, not just this one. Encouraging people to vandalize another Wiki will likely not earn you the respect of Wikipedians; Wikipedians know how painful it is when other Wikis encourage vandalism at this site. PCHS-NJROTC 23:45, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Attacks in the article User:Keegscee

Please do not make personal attacks as you did at User:Keegscee. Misplaced Pages has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Misplaced Pages and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Thank you. PCHS-NJROTC 23:54, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Firstly to PCHS-NJROTC. It isn't a personal attack, so that isn't the right template. I can see why it might count as a G10, but as its a userpage I think that MFD is a more appropriate route. So I've declined this speedy. Secondly to Keegscee. I see where you are coming from, and I do get the joke. But may I suggest you consider making your userpage just a little bit more... diplomatic? ϢereSpielChequers 00:20, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

I have deleted the page as a clear example of an attack page. Any further attempt to encourage people to attack another website will result in a block. 00:54, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi Keegscee, general update. Your userpage has been restored to how it was before you added that contentious paragraph. May I suggest you read wp:userpage before making further edits to User:Keegscee. ϢereSpielChequers 17:07, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Courtesy note

Hello, Keegscee. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. @Kate (talk) 00:14, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

I am Sorry for the mistake

I am sorry about that but it is true that the Secretary of Defense is fired By President Whitmore after Marilyn Whitmore dies. Another reason was that the President was never told about area 51 and Roswell. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.107.239.241 (talk) 09:34, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

There are a lot of reasons why the Secretary of Defense was fired. The fact is, you deliberately changed words to be spelled wrong. The next time you want to make an edit, please do not combine quality edits and vandalism. This will cause your edit to be reverted. Thanks. Keegscee (talk) 18:21, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

List of Crayola crayon colors

Hi. Just a friendly reminder when reverting vandalism, try to avoid going back to a vandalized version by a different editor. PaleAqua (talk) 22:45, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Oops! Thanks for catching that. Keegscee (talk) 23:09, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

December 2009

Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: User talk:PCHS-NJROTC. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. PCHS-NJROTC 00:50, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

And sir, don't think that I'm blah with no sense of humor sir yes sir follow Adolf Hitler to hell; I do indeed have a sense of humor and even the same temptation to be immature, but I know how to hold myself back. I could similarily post links to Jessica Selder's real Myspace and ask everyone to bomb her with hate mail and (fake) death threats for the crimes she appears to have committed against Misplaced Pages, but that would be very immature and I doubt that anyone else would be laughing and I'd likely be blocked. I can hold myself back, you need to learn to do the same if you want to get anywhere here at WP. PCHS-NJROTC 01:49, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Keegscee for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. PCHS-NJROTC 01:24, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Just so you know, I'm not trying to pick on you; notice I hadn't so much as mentioned you after that one night until you replied today, so I attempted to explain as to "why." I don't go out of my way to get people canned, I just think it's a pretty serious issue when someone is encouraging others to abuse other sites in violation of their ISPs' AUPs. I opened the sockpuppetry investigation because I found it odd that you hadn't yet responded to me at all regarding the incident until a day after I got involved in a very similar incident involving a seemingly unrelated thread at Talk:Main Page, unrelated if you're not a puppetmaster that is. How did you know about my comments at the user page of the RC Patroler? The only time I really go out of my way to dog somebody is if they're a "cheerleader vandal," the type of person who started that thread in the first place, and the reason is because a lot of these cheerleader vandals are following instructions from a chain letter distributed among cheerleaders on Myspace to vandalize Misplaced Pages because apparently "WIKIPEDIA HATES YOU (cheerleaders)." I know this because my girlfriend is a cheerleader and received one of those chain letters from someone at another school. You're basically doing the same thing as the creator of that chainletter by encouraging people to vandalise Conservapedia because "they are a bunch of nutjobs." I honestly didn't even know what Conservapedia was until I read about it on your talk page, and when my mouth originally dropped, it could have been something making fun of conservatives for all knew, but I still found it unacceptable to encourage vandalism. PCHS-NJROTC 03:00, 4 December 2009 (UTC)