| Revision as of 16:51, 28 December 2005 editGuettarda (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators63,420 edits agree with jpgordon← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:09, 28 December 2005 edit undoFrancisTyers (talk | contribs)13,802 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| :I would like to endorse the request. JFAS appears to have pursued a vendetta against deeceevoice and has also harrassed users who supported deeceevoice in her RFC. ] 16:51, 28 December 2005 (UTC) | :I would like to endorse the request. JFAS appears to have pursued a vendetta against deeceevoice and has also harrassed users who supported deeceevoice in her RFC. ] 16:51, 28 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
| :I would also endorse this request. JFAS should get on with writing an encyclopaedia. - ] 17:09, 28 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:09, 28 December 2005
I'd like to see this arbitration case examine the actions of User:Justforasecond. A very strong case can be made that these have constituted harassment. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 04:33, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
- I would like to endorse the request. JFAS appears to have pursued a vendetta against deeceevoice and has also harrassed users who supported deeceevoice in her RFC. Guettarda 16:51, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- I would also endorse this request. JFAS should get on with writing an encyclopaedia. - FrancisTyers 17:09, 28 December 2005 (UTC)