| Revision as of 17:18, 7 December 2009 editHipocrite (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,615 edits →Climate Assessment Uncertainty Characterizations: Delete← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:32, 7 December 2009 edit undoZuluPapa5 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers6,447 edits →Climate Assessment Uncertainty Characterizations: '''Abstain with comment'''Next edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| * '''Delete''' POV fork of both Global warming and Global warming controversy ] (]) 17:18, 7 December 2009 (UTC) | * '''Delete''' POV fork of both Global warming and Global warming controversy ] (]) 17:18, 7 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Abstain with comment''' I created the article after concessional talk on my talk page, where a prior version was speedy deleted. I suspected the AFD serves and agenda that is not in wiki's best interests. The infant article has sufficient primary and secondary source support (will add soon). It meets the necessary requirement for relevant material. There are abundant other articles on wiki for which is may cross reference, yet it take on the very important Climate Assessment issues. Frankly the an editor with admits ed with COI disagrees (William M. Connolley], the AFD complainer then drive by tags with no talk, and this AFD is unfounded in fact, the AFD should be dismissed. I request admin oversight for the possibly of disruptive editors who are not assuming good faith in the article. ] (]) 17:32, 7 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:32, 7 December 2009
Climate Assessment Uncertainty Characterizations
- Climate Assessment Uncertainty Characterizations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This highly detailed essay on statistics based on a single source is totally unsuitable material for an encyclopedic article Polargeo (talk) 17:13, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- Delete POV fork of both Global warming and Global warming controversy Hipocrite (talk) 17:18, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- Abstain with comment I created the article after concessional talk on my talk page, where a prior version was speedy deleted. I suspected the AFD serves and agenda that is not in wiki's best interests. The infant article has sufficient primary and secondary source support (will add soon). It meets the necessary requirement for relevant material. There are abundant other articles on wiki for which is may cross reference, yet it take on the very important Climate Assessment issues. Frankly the an editor with admits ed with COI disagrees (William M. Connolley], the AFD complainer then drive by tags with no talk, and this AFD is unfounded in fact, the AFD should be dismissed. I request admin oversight for the possibly of disruptive editors who are not assuming good faith in the article. Zulu Papa 5 ☆ (talk) 17:32, 7 December 2009 (UTC)