Misplaced Pages

Talk:Trigintaduonion: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:24, 19 December 2009 editDistortiondude (talk | contribs)462 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 20:54, 20 December 2009 edit undoArthur Rubin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers130,168 edits minimum requirements to avoid deletionNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:

This page should not be deleted because it is not completely finished, and there is little information on the subject, so it may take a while to complete. ] 14:23 (EST) This page should not be deleted because it is not completely finished, and there is little information on the subject, so it may take a while to complete. ] 14:23 (EST)

:Suggestions for the minimal improvements which would be needed to avoid deletion:
:#Note that arxiv articles and Douglas Wilhelm Harder's personal web page at University of Waterloo are '''not''' ]. Published articles in peer-reviewed journals and possibly personal web pages of recognized experts who would qualify for a Misplaced Pages article might be allowed.
:#There do seem to be a few published papers that use the term, and ''those'' might be allowable references. However, please note the word "seem"" in that statement; it's difficult to tell whether other terms for the concept are more common, even if the published papers indicated adequate notability.
: — ] ] 20:54, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:54, 20 December 2009

This page should not be deleted because it is not completely finished, and there is little information on the subject, so it may take a while to complete. User:Distortiondude 14:23 (EST)

Suggestions for the minimal improvements which would be needed to avoid deletion:
  1. Note that arxiv articles and Douglas Wilhelm Harder's personal web page at University of Waterloo are not reliable sources. Published articles in peer-reviewed journals and possibly personal web pages of recognized experts who would qualify for a Misplaced Pages article might be allowed.
  2. There do seem to be a few published papers that use the term, and those might be allowable references. However, please note the word "seem"" in that statement; it's difficult to tell whether other terms for the concept are more common, even if the published papers indicated adequate notability.
Arthur Rubin (talk) 20:54, 20 December 2009 (UTC)