| Revision as of 20:54, 20 December 2009 editArthur Rubin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers130,168 edits minimum requirements to avoid deletion← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:47, 20 December 2009 edit undoJohnBlackburne (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers30,799 edits →Copyright violations: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| :#There do seem to be a few published papers that use the term, and ''those'' might be allowable references. However, please note the word "seem"" in that statement; it's difficult to tell whether other terms for the concept are more common, even if the published papers indicated adequate notability. | :#There do seem to be a few published papers that use the term, and ''those'' might be allowable references. However, please note the word "seem"" in that statement; it's difficult to tell whether other terms for the concept are more common, even if the published papers indicated adequate notability. | ||
| : — ] ] 20:54, 20 December 2009 (UTC) | : — ] ] 20:54, 20 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
| == Copyright violations == | |||
| I just reverted all the edits to this page today as they were a straight copy of the source . They fell far short of WP standards anyway, and the reference is not a very good one as already noted. --] (]) 23:47, 20 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:47, 20 December 2009
This page should not be deleted because it is not completely finished, and there is little information on the subject, so it may take a while to complete. User:Distortiondude 14:23 (EST)
- Suggestions for the minimal improvements which would be needed to avoid deletion:
- Note that arxiv articles and Douglas Wilhelm Harder's personal web page at University of Waterloo are not reliable sources. Published articles in peer-reviewed journals and possibly personal web pages of recognized experts who would qualify for a Misplaced Pages article might be allowed.
- There do seem to be a few published papers that use the term, and those might be allowable references. However, please note the word "seem"" in that statement; it's difficult to tell whether other terms for the concept are more common, even if the published papers indicated adequate notability.
- — Arthur Rubin (talk) 20:54, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Copyright violations
I just reverted all the edits to this page today as they were a straight copy of the source here. They fell far short of WP standards anyway, and the reference is not a very good one as already noted. --JohnBlackburne (talk) 23:47, 20 December 2009 (UTC)