| Revision as of 14:50, 23 December 2009 editGoldRingChip (talk | contribs)Administrators135,422 edits →External links← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:30, 13 April 2010 edit undoChris Capoccia (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users85,923 edits reformatted refsNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| The Act was sponsored by ], a Republican ] from Michigan. It was introduced in large part to combat the campaign by ] from the ], of ]. Phelps and his supporters regularly demonstrated at the funerals of American service members who lost their lives in the ], on the grounds that the deaths are divine retribution for social tolerance of ]. While protest is normally protected by the ], ] are not.<ref>See e.g. '']'', 315 U.S. 568 (1942)</ref> | The Act was sponsored by ], a Republican ] from Michigan. It was introduced in large part to combat the campaign by ] from the ], of ]. Phelps and his supporters regularly demonstrated at the funerals of American service members who lost their lives in the ], on the grounds that the deaths are divine retribution for social tolerance of ]. While protest is normally protected by the ], ] are not.<ref>See e.g. '']'', 315 U.S. 568 (1942)</ref> | ||
| The Act was approved by the House via roll call vote with an overwhelming majority of 408 to 3. ] (R-]), ] (D-]) and ] (D-]) voted against the Act, opposing it on ] and ] grounds. Twenty-one members of the House of Representatives did not vote. Barney Frank said of the vote, "I think it’s very likely to be found unconstitutional. It’s true that when you defend civil liberties you are typically defending people who do obnoxious |
The Act was approved by the House via roll call vote with an overwhelming majority of 408 to 3. ] (R-]), ] (D-]) and ] (D-]) voted against the Act, opposing it on ] and ] grounds. Twenty-one members of the House of Representatives did not vote. Barney Frank said of the vote, "I think it’s very likely to be found unconstitutional. It’s true that when you defend civil liberties you are typically defending people who do obnoxious things… You play into their hand when you let them provoke you into overdoing it. I don’t want these thugs to claim America is hypocritical."<ref>{{cite news |work=] |url=http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-145577702.html |title=House OKs ban on funeral protests; Leaders hope to have measure to president by Memorial Day |date=May 10, 2006 |first=Christina |last=Bellantoni |accessdate=April 13, 2010}}</ref> | ||
| The ] opposed the legislation, saying that the Act was unconstitutional and that it would not stand up in court. They said of a similar ban in ], "The ACLU lawsuit recognizes that Kentucky has an interest in showing respect and compassion for the deceased and for their families, but argues that sections of these laws go too far in prohibiting peaceful protests."<ref> |
The ] opposed the legislation, saying that the Act was unconstitutional and that it would not stand up in court. They said of a similar ban in ], "The ACLU lawsuit recognizes that Kentucky has an interest in showing respect and compassion for the deceased and for their families, but argues that sections of these laws go too far in prohibiting peaceful protests."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://hubpolitics.com/2006/05/11/rep-frank-votes-against-%e2%80%9crespect-for-america%e2%80%99s-fallen-heroes-act/ |title= Rep. Frank Votes Against 'Respect for America’s Fallen Heroes Act' |first=Aaron |last=Margolis |date=May 11, 2006 |work=Hub Politics |accessdate=April 13, 2010}}{{self-published inline}}</ref> | ||
| The Senate passed the bill unanimously. It was promptly signed into law by President ] on May 29, 2006.<ref></ref> | The Senate passed the bill unanimously. It was promptly signed into law by President ] on May 29, 2006.<ref></ref> | ||
Revision as of 10:30, 13 April 2010
The Respect for America’s Fallen Heroes Act (Pub. L. 109–228 (text) (PDF), 120 Stat. 387, enacted May 29, 2006) is an Act of Congress that prohibits protests within 300 feet (90 m) of the entrance of any cemetery under control of the National Cemetery Administration (a division of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs) from 60 minutes before to 60 minutes after a funeral. Penalties for violating the act are up to $100,000 in fines and up to one year imprisonment.
The Act was sponsored by Mike Rogers, a Republican congressman from Michigan. It was introduced in large part to combat the campaign by Fred Phelps from the Westboro Baptist Church, of Topeka, Kansas. Phelps and his supporters regularly demonstrated at the funerals of American service members who lost their lives in the war in Iraq, on the grounds that the deaths are divine retribution for social tolerance of homosexuality. While protest is normally protected by the First Amendment, fighting words are not.
The Act was approved by the House via roll call vote with an overwhelming majority of 408 to 3. Ron Paul (R-TX), David Wu (D-OR) and Barney Frank (D-MA) voted against the Act, opposing it on civil liberties and constitutional grounds. Twenty-one members of the House of Representatives did not vote. Barney Frank said of the vote, "I think it’s very likely to be found unconstitutional. It’s true that when you defend civil liberties you are typically defending people who do obnoxious things… You play into their hand when you let them provoke you into overdoing it. I don’t want these thugs to claim America is hypocritical."
The ACLU opposed the legislation, saying that the Act was unconstitutional and that it would not stand up in court. They said of a similar ban in Kentucky, "The ACLU lawsuit recognizes that Kentucky has an interest in showing respect and compassion for the deceased and for their families, but argues that sections of these laws go too far in prohibiting peaceful protests."
The Senate passed the bill unanimously. It was promptly signed into law by President George W. Bush on May 29, 2006.
References
- See e.g. Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568 (1942)
- Bellantoni, Christina (May 10, 2006). "House OKs ban on funeral protests; Leaders hope to have measure to president by Memorial Day". The Washington Times. Retrieved April 13, 2010.
- Margolis, Aaron (May 11, 2006). "Rep. Frank Votes Against 'Respect for America's Fallen Heroes Act'". Hub Politics. Retrieved April 13, 2010.
- H.R. 5037 [109th]: Respect for America's Fallen Heroes Act (GovTrack.us)
External links
- Text of the statute, via U.S. Government Printing Office
- Original statute information
- December, 2006 amendment information
- Stephen R. McAllister, draft, "Funeral Picketing Laws and Free Speech", Kansas Law Review, University of Kansas School of Law, June 25, 2007