| Revision as of 23:57, 1 January 2006 edit66.69.131.124 (talk) →3RR← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:59, 1 January 2006 edit undoYuber (talk | contribs)4,476 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{sockpuppet|Enviroknot}} | |||
| # Thanks for experimenting with Misplaced Pages. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use ] for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the ] if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.<!-- Test (first level warning) --> -- ] 06:36, 18 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| # ] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the ] if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to ], are considered ]. If you continue in this manner you may be '''blocked from editing without further warning'''. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. - ] 06:37, 18 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| # Please stop. If you continue to ] pages, you will be ] from editing Misplaced Pages.<!-- Test3 (Third level warning) --> -- ] 06:38, 18 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| # This message is regarding the page ]. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. <!-- Test3-n (Third level warning) --> ] 23:22, 1 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I am reverting vandalism: | |||
| There is no article for "]", "]", "]" or indeed any articles for any other holy books of other religions - Islam has no more right to have a separate article than any other, why is it given special treatment over all others on Misplaced Pages? --] 23:26, 1 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : Erasing an article you disagree with is NOT "reverting vandalism". If you feel it is unfair that a bible desecration article does not exist, then start one. ] 23:27, 1 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::No, I disagree that special articles are made for the Islamic version when no others exist: There is simply no reason for that article to be merged with ]: It is just another aspect of the book and the very title of the article "]'' is POV as it implies that the book is holy when to most of the world it is not. I would not expect other religious books to have the title "]" either --] 23:30, 1 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Discuss it on the talk page then, do not fallaciously describe your edits as "reverting vandalism" when that is clearly not what you are doing. You have been warned. ] 23:32, 1 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Please stop. If you continue to ] pages, you will be ] from editing Misplaced Pages.<!-- Test3 (Third level warning) --> ] 23:37, 1 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. --] 23:52, 1 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==3RR== | |||
| I must inform you that you have broken the ]. | |||
| As a result, you are being blocked for 24 hours. Cheers -- ''] 23:53, 1 January 2006 (UTC)'' <small>]</small> | |||
| Looks like Svest is counting them down. Figures. | |||
Revision as of 23:59, 1 January 2006
 | An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Enviroknot (talk · contribs · logs). Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |