Misplaced Pages

Australian Monarchist League: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:58, 4 January 2010 editBilby (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators40,072 edits Activities: Extended section← Previous edit Revision as of 10:39, 29 January 2010 edit undoBilby (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators40,072 editsm Activities: spNext edit →
Line 11: Line 11:
During the ] on the future of Australia's ], the league took what was seen as a hardline approach, focusing on defending the monarchy – an approach that was quite different to the one that was favoured by some involved in the No campaign, who tended towards downplaying the monarchy and emphasising the weaknesses of the republican models on offer.<ref name="Symons1999-03-02">{{cite news | last = Symons | first = Emma-Kate | date = 2 March 1999 | title = Queen ignored in fight against republic | work = ] | location = ], ] | page = 18 }}</ref> As a result, it was an alternative organisation, ], who were chosen by then Prime Minister ] to help head up the No campaign (along with those supporting an elected head of state).<ref name="Warhurst2009-08-27">{{cite news | last = Warhurst | first = John | date = 27 August 2009 | title = League's booklet sets battlelines for the monarchy debate | work = ] | location = ], ]}}</ref> Nevertheless, the Australian Monarchist League played a role in the proceedings, including unsuccessfully taking the ] to the ] in order to gain a firmer definition of what would count as a "yes" vote in the referendum, arguing that the planned approach, (accepting any vote in which the voter's intention was clear), was such the the counting would be weighted towards "yes", and that it "opened the door for electoral fraud".<ref name="Benwell1999-11-04">{{cite news | last = Benwell | first = Philip | date = 4 November 1999 | title = Valid votes | work = ] | location = ], ] | page = 17 }}</ref><ref name="Crabb1999-11-04">{{cite news | last = Crabb | first = Annabel | date = 4 November 1999 | title = The Republic Vote Monarchist league's non non to oui oui | work = ] | location = ], ] | page = 7 }}</ref><ref name="Hilferty1999-11-03">{{cite news | last1 = Hilferty | first = Tim | last2 = Luff | first2 = David | date = 3 November 1999 | title = Queen case claims bias | work = ] | location = ], ] | page = 8 }}</ref><ref name="HobartMercury1999-11-05">{{cite news | date = 5 November 1999 | title = Setback for monarchists | work = ] | location = ], ] }}</ref> During the ] on the future of Australia's ], the league took what was seen as a hardline approach, focusing on defending the monarchy – an approach that was quite different to the one that was favoured by some involved in the No campaign, who tended towards downplaying the monarchy and emphasising the weaknesses of the republican models on offer.<ref name="Symons1999-03-02">{{cite news | last = Symons | first = Emma-Kate | date = 2 March 1999 | title = Queen ignored in fight against republic | work = ] | location = ], ] | page = 18 }}</ref> As a result, it was an alternative organisation, ], who were chosen by then Prime Minister ] to help head up the No campaign (along with those supporting an elected head of state).<ref name="Warhurst2009-08-27">{{cite news | last = Warhurst | first = John | date = 27 August 2009 | title = League's booklet sets battlelines for the monarchy debate | work = ] | location = ], ]}}</ref> Nevertheless, the Australian Monarchist League played a role in the proceedings, including unsuccessfully taking the ] to the ] in order to gain a firmer definition of what would count as a "yes" vote in the referendum, arguing that the planned approach, (accepting any vote in which the voter's intention was clear), was such the the counting would be weighted towards "yes", and that it "opened the door for electoral fraud".<ref name="Benwell1999-11-04">{{cite news | last = Benwell | first = Philip | date = 4 November 1999 | title = Valid votes | work = ] | location = ], ] | page = 17 }}</ref><ref name="Crabb1999-11-04">{{cite news | last = Crabb | first = Annabel | date = 4 November 1999 | title = The Republic Vote Monarchist league's non non to oui oui | work = ] | location = ], ] | page = 7 }}</ref><ref name="Hilferty1999-11-03">{{cite news | last1 = Hilferty | first = Tim | last2 = Luff | first2 = David | date = 3 November 1999 | title = Queen case claims bias | work = ] | location = ], ] | page = 8 }}</ref><ref name="HobartMercury1999-11-05">{{cite news | date = 5 November 1999 | title = Setback for monarchists | work = ] | location = ], ] }}</ref>


Both prior and subsequent to the referendum, the Australian Monarchists League have acted to protect the image of the constitutional monarchy. In 2005 the organisation lodged formal complaints about an image depicting the late ] by photgrapher ] at the Australian Centre for Photography.<ref name="O'Connor2005-08-12">{{cite news | last = Shaunagh | first = O'Connor | date = 12 August 2005 | title = A right royal shocker | work = ] | location = ], ] | page = 87 }}</ref> Similarly, they wrote to the Japanese ambassador in 1998 after ] ran an advertisement showing a ] with the words "Don't worry, Your Majesty, you're not the only British export that's had its day", resulting in Toyota withdrawing the advertisement;<ref name="Watson-Smyth1998-03-20">{{cite news | last = Watson-Smyth | first = Kate | date = 20 March 1998 | title = Ford forced to pull Full Monty ad | work = ] | location = ], ] | url = http://www.independent.co.uk/news/ford-forced-to-pull-full-monty-ad-1151187.html | accessdate = 4 January 2010 }}</ref> and in 2008 complained to both the ] and the ] after Coopers ran and advertisement stating "Forget the monarchy, support the publicians", forcing its withdrawal.<ref name="MX2008-08-08">{{cite news | date = 8 August 2008 | title = Joke beer ads canned | work = ] | location = ], ] | page = 6 }}</ref> Both prior and subsequent to the referendum, the Australian Monarchists League have acted to protect the image of the constitutional monarchy. In 2005 the organisation lodged formal complaints about an image depicting the late ] by photgrapher ] at the Australian Centre for Photography.<ref name="O'Connor2005-08-12">{{cite news | last = Shaunagh | first = O'Connor | date = 12 August 2005 | title = A right royal shocker | work = ] | location = ], ] | page = 87 }}</ref> Similarly, they wrote to the Japanese ambassador in 1998 after ] ran an advertisement showing a ] with the words "Don't worry, Your Majesty, you're not the only British export that's had its day", resulting in Toyota withdrawing the advertisement;<ref name="Watson-Smyth1998-03-20">{{cite news | last = Watson-Smyth | first = Kate | date = 20 March 1998 | title = Ford forced to pull Full Monty ad | work = ] | location = ], ] | url = http://www.independent.co.uk/news/ford-forced-to-pull-full-monty-ad-1151187.html | accessdate = 4 January 2010 }}</ref> and in 2008 complained to both the ] and the ] after Coopers ran an advertisement stating "Forget the monarchy, support the publicians", forcing its withdrawal.<ref name="MX2008-08-08">{{cite news | date = 8 August 2008 | title = Joke beer ads canned | work = ] | location = ], ] | page = 6 }}</ref>


Along with their actions during the referendum, the League have been active in protecting the symbols of Australia's constitutional monarchy: they acted to ensure that the pledge of loyalty to the monarch remained a part of ],<ref name="Harvey2000-06-24">{{cite news | last = Harvey | first = Claire | date = 24 June 2000 | title = Scouts prepared to back Queen | work = ] | location = ], ] | page = 18 }}</ref> and spoke against the removal of references to the Queen from the Victorian legal system.<ref name="HeraldSun2009-12-19">{{cite news | date = 19 December 2009 | title = Smokers, royalists butted out | work = ] | location = ], ] | page = 9 }}</ref> Aside from campaigning, the AML distributed copies of ] portrait of ] after the Commonwealth Government Bookshops ceased selling photographs of the monarch.<ref name="AMLAboutUs">{{cite web | title = About Australian Monarchist League | work = Australian Monarchist League | url = http://www.monarchist.org.au/aboutus.html | accessdate = 5 January 2010 }}</ref> Along with their actions during the referendum, the League have been active in protecting the symbols of Australia's constitutional monarchy: they acted to ensure that the pledge of loyalty to the monarch remained a part of ],<ref name="Harvey2000-06-24">{{cite news | last = Harvey | first = Claire | date = 24 June 2000 | title = Scouts prepared to back Queen | work = ] | location = ], ] | page = 18 }}</ref> and spoke against the removal of references to the Queen from the Victorian legal system.<ref name="HeraldSun2009-12-19">{{cite news | date = 19 December 2009 | title = Smokers, royalists butted out | work = ] | location = ], ] | page = 9 }}</ref> Aside from campaigning, the AML distributed copies of ] portrait of ] after the Commonwealth Government Bookshops ceased selling photographs of the monarch.<ref name="AMLAboutUs">{{cite web | title = About Australian Monarchist League | work = Australian Monarchist League | url = http://www.monarchist.org.au/aboutus.html | accessdate = 5 January 2010 }}</ref>

Revision as of 10:39, 29 January 2010

The Australian Monarchist League is a non-profit organisation, headquartered in Sydney, Australia, promoting the monarchy of Australia, and providing information to members of the public about Australian history and the Australian Constitution. The organisation was part of the "no" campaign in the 1999 republic referendum, which asked whether Australia should become a republic and whether Australia should alter the constitution to insert a preamble. Neither of the amendments passed.

Structure

The Australian Monarchist League is incorporated as an association in New South Wales, and were originally founded as a branch of the London-based International Monarchist League (IML). However, in 1993, the League severed affiliation with the IML, established itself as an independent Australian body. (A separate organisation, the Monarchist League in Australia, was formed in 2006 as an affiliate of the IML). The organisation is not formally associated with any political party or other organisation, and it has no paid staff, relying on volunteers to keep the group functioning. Philip Benwell, a merchant banker, has served on a volunteer basis as the national chairman and spokesman for the league for over ten years.

The League has established a Trust with a number of prominent Australian businessmen as Trustees. The most important role of the Trust is to raise and administer funds for the organisation's activities.

Activities

During the 1999 republic referendum on the future of Australia's constitutional monarchy, the league took what was seen as a hardline approach, focusing on defending the monarchy – an approach that was quite different to the one that was favoured by some involved in the No campaign, who tended towards downplaying the monarchy and emphasising the weaknesses of the republican models on offer. As a result, it was an alternative organisation, Australians for Constitutional Monarchy, who were chosen by then Prime Minister John Howard to help head up the No campaign (along with those supporting an elected head of state). Nevertheless, the Australian Monarchist League played a role in the proceedings, including unsuccessfully taking the Australian Electoral Commission to the Federal Court in order to gain a firmer definition of what would count as a "yes" vote in the referendum, arguing that the planned approach, (accepting any vote in which the voter's intention was clear), was such the the counting would be weighted towards "yes", and that it "opened the door for electoral fraud".

Both prior and subsequent to the referendum, the Australian Monarchists League have acted to protect the image of the constitutional monarchy. In 2005 the organisation lodged formal complaints about an image depicting the late Princess Diana by photgrapher Erwin Olaf at the Australian Centre for Photography. Similarly, they wrote to the Japanese ambassador in 1998 after Toyota ran an advertisement showing a Range Rover with the words "Don't worry, Your Majesty, you're not the only British export that's had its day", resulting in Toyota withdrawing the advertisement; and in 2008 complained to both the Coopers Brewery and the Advertising Standards Bureau after Coopers ran an advertisement stating "Forget the monarchy, support the publicians", forcing its withdrawal.

Along with their actions during the referendum, the League have been active in protecting the symbols of Australia's constitutional monarchy: they acted to ensure that the pledge of loyalty to the monarch remained a part of Scouts Australia, and spoke against the removal of references to the Queen from the Victorian legal system. Aside from campaigning, the AML distributed copies of William Dargie's portrait of Queen Elizabeth II after the Commonwealth Government Bookshops ceased selling photographs of the monarch.

Other activities include disseminating literature and maintaining a library on Australian history and the Australian Constitution, and conducting public seminars.

Membership

The League has approximately 3000 members as of 2008, with branches in each State and in the Australian Capital Territory. All office bearers are elected by the membership and serve on a voluntary basis.

References

  1. Mitchell, Alex (11 June 2006). "Naming tiff divides wild colonial fan groups". The Sydney Morning Herald. Sydney, Australia. Retrieved 19 December 2009.
  2. "About Us". Australian Monarchist League. Retrieved 23 December 2009.
  3. "Philip Benwell". The Australian Monarchist League. Retrieved 4 January 2010.
  4. Symons, Emma-Kate (2 March 1999). "Queen ignored in fight against republic". The Daily Telegraph. Sydney, Australia. p. 18.
  5. Warhurst, John (27 August 2009). "League's booklet sets battlelines for the monarchy debate". The Canberra Times. Canberra, Australia.
  6. Benwell, Philip (4 November 1999). "Valid votes". The Advertiser. Adelaide, Australia. p. 17.
  7. Crabb, Annabel (4 November 1999). "The Republic Vote Monarchist league's non non to oui oui". The Advertiser. Adelaide, Australia. p. 7.
  8. Hilferty, Tim; Luff, David (3 November 1999). "Queen case claims bias". The Daily Telegraph. Sydney, Australia. p. 8.
  9. "Setback for monarchists". Hobart Mercury. Hobart, Australia. 5 November 1999.
  10. Shaunagh, O'Connor (12 August 2005). "A right royal shocker". The Daily Telegraph. Sydney, Australia. p. 87.
  11. Watson-Smyth, Kate (20 March 1998). "Ford forced to pull Full Monty ad". The Independent. London, United Kingdom. Retrieved 4 January 2010.
  12. "Joke beer ads canned". mX. Melbourne, Australia. 8 August 2008. p. 6.
  13. Harvey, Claire (24 June 2000). "Scouts prepared to back Queen". The Weekend Australian. Sydney, Australia. p. 18.
  14. "Smokers, royalists butted out". Herald Sun. Melbourne, Australia. 19 December 2009. p. 9.
  15. "About Australian Monarchist League". Australian Monarchist League. Retrieved 5 January 2010.
  16. McMahon, Barbara (27 April 2008). "Last stand for Australia's monarchists". The Observer. London, United Kingdom. Retrieved 19 December 2009.

See also

External links

Categories: