Misplaced Pages

User talk:Dalej78: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:29, 11 January 2010 editTony Sidaway (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers81,722 edits Global warming: {{subst:uw-probation|Global warming|Misplaced Pages:General sanctions/Climate change probation}}← Previous edit Revision as of 16:41, 11 January 2010 edit undoJulzes (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,061 edits In fact, there may be a lull: use a dictionaryNext edit →
Line 12: Line 12:
The record temperature for a single year was set over a decade ago and if anything there has been a slight decline since that (but still allowing your hottest decade thing). That amounts to a lull. I refer you to various sources on this including Science magazine, 2 October 2009, pp.28-9.] (]) 00:23, 11 January 2010 (UTC) The record temperature for a single year was set over a decade ago and if anything there has been a slight decline since that (but still allowing your hottest decade thing). That amounts to a lull. I refer you to various sources on this including Science magazine, 2 October 2009, pp.28-9.] (]) 00:23, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
: A very odd way of defining "lull". --] 00:26, 11 January 2010 (UTC) : A very odd way of defining "lull". --] 00:26, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

I suggest you look up the word in a dictionary, because there is nothing odd about saying that there is a lull in warming when temperatures temporarily level off.] (]) 16:41, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

==Global warming== ==Global warming==
] Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed{{#if:Global warming|, ],}} is on ]. {{#if:Misplaced Pages:General sanctions/Climate change probation|A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at ].|}} {{#if:|{{{3}}}|Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.<br><br>''The above is a ]. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you.''}}<!-- Template:uw-probation --> --] 00:29, 11 January 2010 (UTC) ] Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed{{#if:Global warming|, ],}} is on ]. {{#if:Misplaced Pages:General sanctions/Climate change probation|A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at ].|}} {{#if:|{{{3}}}|Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.<br><br>''The above is a ]. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you.''}}<!-- Template:uw-probation --> --] 00:29, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:41, 11 January 2010

I'm bullied by the cyber-thugs on Misplaced Pages. If you ever try to question the information that users present as cannon on wikipedia, you get shot down in about 30 seconds. So liberalism has run amuk on Misplaced Pages, i.e. they only allow glowing information about their dear leader, President Barack Hussein Obama. They only allow alarmist, wild, wacky claims that the earth is warming, when in fact, it is cooling, and the list goes on and on. It appears that Misplaced Pages is just another appendage of the wild, leftist, lame-stream media run amuk with liberal ideaologies and theories.

GW Discussion

Would you be so kind to start the discussion about this diff? ChyranandChloe (talk) 22:34, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

In fact, there may be a lull

There really should be something about this in the article, but in reality it's best not handled at all than handled badly. Whatever lull we're in is part of an opposite trend that is quite alarmingly serious.Julzes (talk) 22:50, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

What lull? We've just had what is, on some measures, the hottest decade since records began. --TS 00:12, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

The record temperature for a single year was set over a decade ago and if anything there has been a slight decline since that (but still allowing your hottest decade thing). That amounts to a lull. I refer you to various sources on this including Science magazine, 2 October 2009, pp.28-9.Julzes (talk) 00:23, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

A very odd way of defining "lull". --TS 00:26, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

I suggest you look up the word in a dictionary, because there is nothing odd about saying that there is a lull in warming when temperatures temporarily level off.Julzes (talk) 16:41, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Global warming

Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Global warming, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Misplaced Pages:General sanctions/Climate change probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.

The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. --TS 00:29, 11 January 2010 (UTC)