Revision as of 07:38, 14 January 2010 editGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits →Re: A problem with the baptist article: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:39, 15 January 2010 edit undoGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits →Re: A problem with the baptist article: ReplyNext edit → | ||
Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
Re : If you have issues with the article, please discuss the issue on the ]. However, your use of "heretical", "slaughtered", and "murderers" was not neutral terminology. -- ] (]) 07:38, 14 January 2010 (UTC) | Re : If you have issues with the article, please discuss the issue on the ]. However, your use of "heretical", "slaughtered", and "murderers" was not neutral terminology. -- ] (]) 07:38, 14 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Re : I suggested that you bring up the issues you have with the article on the talk page because then you can discuss the issue with other interested editors on fixing specific things. If you bring it up, somebody will likely respond to you and work with you regarding the issues that you bring up. As for why the ] article is protected, since I was not involved in setting the protection, I don't have an opinion on it. Again, if you have an issue with the article, bring it up on the article's talk page. -- ] (]) 08:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:39, 15 January 2010
|
January 2010
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Misplaced Pages articles. Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:00, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:20, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Re: A problem with the baptist article
Re your message: If you have issues with the article, please discuss the issue on the article's talk page. However, your use of "heretical", "slaughtered", and "murderers" was not neutral terminology. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:38, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
- Re your message: I suggested that you bring up the issues you have with the article on the talk page because then you can discuss the issue with other interested editors on fixing specific things. If you bring it up, somebody will likely respond to you and work with you regarding the issues that you bring up. As for why the Muslim article is protected, since I was not involved in setting the protection, I don't have an opinion on it. Again, if you have an issue with the article, bring it up on the article's talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)