Revision as of 08:46, 18 January 2010 editDaedalus969 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers19,809 edits Reverted good faith edits by James dalton bell; Not in the mood to deal with this. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:41, 18 January 2010 edit undoMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 1 thread(s) (older than 7d) to User talk:Daedalus969/Archive 17.Next edit → | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
<div style="border:3px solid blue;background:#0095B6;font-family:verdana"> | <div style="border:3px solid blue;background:#0095B6;font-family:verdana"> | ||
] Dear Daedalus969,<br />I just wanted to wish you and your family a HAPPY NEW YEAR. Cheers, and happy editing in 2010.]]{{-}}</div> | ] Dear Daedalus969,<br />I just wanted to wish you and your family a HAPPY NEW YEAR. Cheers, and happy editing in 2010.]]{{-}}</div> | ||
== Sysop? you aren't? == | |||
Here I've thought you were a sysop all this time. I would be willing to nominate you if nec, it might not help you but I think highly of your particaption here. ] (]) 01:26, 11 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
: on your talk page.— ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 01:31, 11 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
:Have me supporting you would certainly help. Afeterall, I contributed to your block. And haveing a person who would normally vote oppose do the opposite is always a good thing in RFA's.--] <sup>]</sup> 01:40, 11 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
::I still don't think I'm ready.. it's too soon since my last conflict.— ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 01:42, 11 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
:::But your last conflict would be void if the two people that you had a conflict with were supporting you! That would make people realize that your block was a mistake. If you do go up for an RFA, i'll be there to co-nom it. (Unless you don;t want me to)--] <sup>]</sup> 01:44, 11 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
::::What you do is up to you, but I still don't think that that would really help matters. I was still uncivil, and your behavior does not excuse mine.— ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 01:47, 11 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
:::::Alrigh. Well whenever you do go up for one. Don't hesitate to tell me.--] <sup>]</sup> 01:48, 11 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
::::::Alright.— ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 01:50, 11 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
:::::::Yes, me too. Let me know. :)]] 01:53, 11 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
== ''The Misplaced Pages Signpost'': 11 January 2010 == | == ''The Misplaced Pages Signpost'': 11 January 2010 == |
Revision as of 13:41, 18 January 2010
5:51 pm, 3 January 2025 (PDT)Welcome to my talk page! I will reply on your talk page unless you prefer otherwise as usually noted on your talk page. If you are an anonymous editor, I will reply here.
|
Archives | ||||||||
|
||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Happy New Year
Dear Daedalus969,I just wanted to wish you and your family a HAPPY NEW YEAR. Cheers, and happy editing in 2010.Malke2010
The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 11 January 2010
- From the editor: Call for writers
- 2009 in review: 2009 in Review
- Books: New Book namespace created
- News and notes: Wikimania 2011, Flaggedrevs, Global sysops and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/Transaction Go
Done. Deleted per your request. UltraExactZZ ~ Did 15:16, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
Wallflowers98 sock info
I noticed your reports at WP:AIV a little bit ago. I had an encounter earlier today with both of those users and several more on Full House. Here's the list. Dawnseeker2000 04:19, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- En7834 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Danteorange78 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Generation Y-Not? (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Soda fan90 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
BLP issue
You were involved in the BLP discussion about John Rosatti. I'm currently involved in a BLP debate that I think is very similar. In my case, there is a lurid, very contentious allegation based solely on something that a single author said in her book. She states it as fact (based on an anon source IIRC), not even an allegation. No other media source has even made the allegation, let alone repeated it as fact. This seems odd by itself, but when you consider that the subject is Erik Prince, the CEO of Blackwater and far from being a media favorite, it becomes even more odd. Would you mind taking a look at the discussion here and telling me if you think I am off base? Niteshift36 (talk) 21:08, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page and commented on the relevant page.— Dædαlus 00:38, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
vandalism?
You have a broad definition of vandalism. In the future, I strongly suggst you just butt out CaptainPickles (talk) 01:40, 18 January 2010 (UTC)