| Revision as of 16:16, 21 January 2010 editMZMcBride (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users190,597 edits →Alphabetize views: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:44, 21 January 2010 edit undoRd232 (talk | contribs)54,863 edits →Alphabetize viewsNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| Would it make sense to alphabetize the views by username? I've never really liked the idea of chronological ordering, as I think it unfairly favors earlier views too much. --] (]) 16:16, 21 January 2010 (UTC) | Would it make sense to alphabetize the views by username? I've never really liked the idea of chronological ordering, as I think it unfairly favors earlier views too much. --] (]) 16:16, 21 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
| ==Collaborative views== | |||
| Could we have a go at establishing some collaboratively edited views? I can see the volume of individual, partially overlapping, partially contradicting views spiralling into ] extremely quickly. Perhaps this could be in a separate section at the bottom. ] <sup>]</sup> 16:44, 21 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:44, 21 January 2010
Let's try to keep it civil and succinct, eh?
Alphabetize views
Would it make sense to alphabetize the views by username? I've never really liked the idea of chronological ordering, as I think it unfairly favors earlier views too much. --MZMcBride (talk) 16:16, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Collaborative views
Could we have a go at establishing some collaboratively edited views? I can see the volume of individual, partially overlapping, partially contradicting views spiralling into WP:TLDR extremely quickly. Perhaps this could be in a separate section at the bottom. Rd232 16:44, 21 January 2010 (UTC)