| Revision as of 02:35, 6 January 2006 editForallah (talk | contribs)19 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:47, 6 January 2006 edit undoCalton (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users78,494 edits added edit countsNext edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| *'''Delete''' I'm not impressed. --] 11:38, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' I'm not impressed. --] 11:38, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' - pap. ]<small> ] ]</small> 13:55, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' - pap. ]<small> ] ]</small> 13:55, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' - People writing this kind of articles should be shot. ] | *'''Delete''' - People writing this kind of articles should be shot. ]] <small>User had 8 edits before this recent blizzard of podcasting/blog "delete" votes</small> | ||
| *'''Delete''' - pointless, cruft | *'''Delete''' - pointless, cruft | ||
| *'''Delete''' Please make it end. ] 19:12, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' Please make it end. ] 19:12, 5 January 2006 (UTC)] User had 3 edits before this recent blizzard of podcasting/blog "delete" votes</small> | ||
| *'''Comment'''. Please give a valid reason when voting, whether Keep or Delete. I'm okay with either resolution, but the closing admin deserves more than some of the "reason" (or lack thereof) above. ] 19:17, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | *'''Comment'''. Please give a valid reason when voting, whether Keep or Delete. I'm okay with either resolution, but the closing admin deserves more than some of the "reason" (or lack thereof) above. ] 19:17, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''', per Guy. --] 20:19, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''', per Guy. --] 20:19, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Delete''' per nom. ] 02:35, 6 January 2006 (UTC) | * '''Delete''' per nom. ] 02:35, 6 January 2006 (UTC)] <small>User's only edits are to this recent blizzard of podcasting/blog "delete" votes and his/her talk page</small> | ||
Revision as of 05:47, 6 January 2006
Podnography
non-notable; 50k-or-so Google hits, pretty much all of which are Misplaced Pages mirrors or useless blog posts. Hosterweis 12:50, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - Non-notable vanity trash - Misplaced Pages needs about 100% less of this. 71.136.194.138 12:55, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
- This vote was made by CptChipJew Cptchipjew 08:37, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - and shove your iPods - Femmina 13:05, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. get rid of this shitty "article" it's nonsense. pur waste of time. waste of bytes. waste of everything!!!!11one — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.12.74.4 (talk • contribs)
- Delete podcruft and vansipamcruftisement at that. Just zis Guy, you know? / AfD? 14:34, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, per Guy. PJM 17:57, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, per 81.12.74.4. Hey! If that's the author, can't we speedy delete? Dan 18:20, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
- No, 81.12.74.4 (talk · contribs) is not the article author, what makes you think that? He only vandalized the article. —Quarl 2006-01-03 22:20Z
- Soz, wishful thinking from looking at his contribs Dan 17:24, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. *drew 22:07, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
- Keep or rename or merge. The name of the article is a neologism, but the article is OK otherwise, establishes notability of the phenomenon via media attention (WSJ, NYT, SFC). Seems as notable as the other podcasting-related articles such as Godcasting. The article claims major newspapers including the SF Chronicle have used the term "podnography". —Quarl 2006-01-03 22:13Z
- I can't help but mention the fact that I can't seem to find an article called Godcasting anywhere on Misplaced Pages.
This may be, in fact, the only page that mentions it at all.Actually, I found eight articles across all Misplaced Pages namespaces that mention the word "Godcasting". Hosterweis 06:40, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- I can't help but mention the fact that I can't seem to find an article called Godcasting anywhere on Misplaced Pages.
- Merge with Bodcast, per my recent suggestion on the page. Daniel Case 03:33, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
- Merge with Bodcast and also Porncasting. —Quarl 2006-01-04 11:02Z
- Delete, per nom. —Kmf164 (talk | contribs) 06:22, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Gets 55,000 Google hits, which makes it verifiable and notable, if personally repugnant. Turnstep 15:19, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
- To clarify, a Google search for "podnography -wikipedia" still yields 49,000 hits.
- Delete Utter rubbish. Incognito 02:20, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Get this utter crap out of wikipedia. Should just ban blog* articles and pod* articles. --Timecop 04:33, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete I'm not impressed. --Depakote 11:38, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - pap. Proto t c 13:55, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - People writing this kind of articles should be shot. TapirTapir User had 8 edits before this recent blizzard of podcasting/blog "delete" votes
- Delete - pointless, cruft
- Delete Please make it end. Jmax- 19:12, 5 January 2006 (UTC) Jmax User had 3 edits before this recent blizzard of podcasting/blog "delete" votes
- Comment. Please give a valid reason when voting, whether Keep or Delete. I'm okay with either resolution, but the closing admin deserves more than some of the "reason" (or lack thereof) above. Turnstep 19:17, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, per Guy. --kingboyk 20:19, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Forallah 02:35, 6 January 2006 (UTC) Forallah User's only edits are to this recent blizzard of podcasting/blog "delete" votes and his/her talk page