Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/John254: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:30, 30 January 2010 edit70.17.170.37 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 16:05, 31 January 2010 edit undoSL93 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers78,593 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 20: Line 20:


======<span style="font-size:150%"> Conclusions </span>====== ======<span style="font-size:150%"> Conclusions </span>======


===== <big>Report date January 31 2010, 16:05 (UTC)</big>=====

{{SPIcat}}

<!-- Please do not add a header here -->

======<span style="font-size:150%"> Suspected sockpuppets </span>======
* {{checkuser|1=Andrew the Assasin}}

<!-- Please duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts-->


======<span style="font-size:150%"> Evidence submitted by ] </span>======
<!--## Sign below your evidence with 4 tilde characters "~~~~" ##-->
John254 had many sockpuppets and tried to give the false impression that he was a new user. Andrew the Assasin were to create Template:SpiAfD, create Template:SpiAfD/doc, add a proposal on the village pu8mp page for it, and tag ] (a John254 sockpuppet) as a sock in ]. I wouldn't have started an SPI report if he didn't just register today.

======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties </span>======
<small><span style="font-weight:normal">''See ].''</span></small>


======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by other users </span>======


======<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>======
{{RFCU| E | No2ndletter | New }} &nbsp;&nbsp; <small>Requested by ] (]) 16:05, 31 January 2010 (UTC) </small>
<!--## Replace CODE LETTER by the appropriate code letter and Replace No2ndLetter if you need a 2nd code letter (or leave it alone if not) ##-->
<!--## Codeletters are:
A - arbcom ban/remedy evasion
B - Ongoing serious pattern vandalism
C - Vote fraud, please wait until after vote closes
D - 3RR with socks
E - Evasion of community based bans or blocks
F - Other, please explain why a check should be run -->
<!--## Make sure your evidence explains why CheckUser is appropriate ##-->


----

Revision as of 16:05, 31 January 2010

John254

John254 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/John254/Archive.

Report date January 30, 2010 02:29(UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets

かなコバ (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Evidence submitted

Identical editing pattern and username pattern. 70.17.170.37 (talk) 02:30, 30 January 2010 (UTC)


Comments by accused parties   
Comments by other users
CheckUser requests
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Conclusions
Report date January 31 2010, 16:05 (UTC)


Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Joe Chill

John254 had many sockpuppets and tried to give the false impression that he was a new user. Andrew the Assasin were to create Template:SpiAfD, create Template:SpiAfD/doc, add a proposal on the village pu8mp page for it, and tag User:Werner Heisenberg (a John254 sockpuppet) as a sock in this AfD. I wouldn't have started an SPI report if he didn't just register today.

Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.

Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
Current status – Awaiting initial clerk review.    Requested by Joe Chill (talk) 16:05, 31 January 2010 (UTC)


Categories: