| Revision as of 16:19, 31 January 2010 editAndrew the Assasin (talk | contribs)26 edits →Comments by accused parties← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:19, 31 January 2010 edit undoTreasuryTag (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users46,645 editsm Reverted edits by Andrew the Assasin (talk) to last version by TreasuryTagNext edit → | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
| <small><span style="font-weight:normal">''See ].''</span></small> | <small><span style="font-weight:normal">''See ].''</span></small> | ||
| ] | |||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by other users </span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by other users </span>====== | ||
Revision as of 16:19, 31 January 2010
John254
John254 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/John254/Archive.
Report date January 30, 2010 02:29(UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
かなコバ (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Evidence submitted
Identical editing pattern and username pattern. 70.17.170.37 (talk) 02:30, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties
Comments by other users
CheckUser requests
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Conclusions
Report date January 31 2010, 16:05 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
- Andrew the Assasin (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Evidence submitted by Joe Chill
John254 had many sockpuppets and tried to give the false impression that he was a new user. Andrew the Assasin were to create Template:SpiAfD, create Template:SpiAfD/doc, add a proposal on the village pu8mp page for it, and tag User:Werner Heisenberg (a John254 sockpuppet) as a sock in this AfD. I wouldn't have started an SPI report if he didn't just register today.
Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users
I can't find significant purpose for this sockpuppet case. Andrew the Assasin (talk) 16:09, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- The user is obviously a sockpuppet, having made a very bizarre first seven edits, and should be blocked as an obvious undeclared alternate account being used to evade scrutiny. I'm not convinced that this is a John254 sock specifically, but that scarcely matters. ╟─TreasuryTag►directorate─╢ 16:12, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Well I do belong to two sockmasters that are both fluent in policy and experience. Can you guess who? Andrew the Assasin (talk) 16:15, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.
- Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
- Current status –
Awaiting initial clerk review. Requested by Joe Chill (talk) 16:05, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Categories: