Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Michelle Crawford: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:56, 2 February 2010 editGregJackP (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers24,867 edits Michelle Crawford← Previous edit Revision as of 10:53, 2 February 2010 edit undoJBsupreme (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers30,453 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 8: Line 8:
*'''Delete''', obviously. There is no notability to speak of here. BLPzeroE. <font color="#BA181F">]</font> (<font color="#BA181F">]</font>) 22:11, 1 February 2010 (UTC) *'''Delete''', obviously. There is no notability to speak of here. BLPzeroE. <font color="#BA181F">]</font> (<font color="#BA181F">]</font>) 22:11, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
*'''Strong delete''' per the above. Not remotely encyclopedically notable. ]''' (]) 00:29, 2 February 2010 (UTC) *'''Strong delete''' per the above. Not remotely encyclopedically notable. ]''' (]) 00:29, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
:'''Delete''' - for reasons stated above. (] (]) 02:56, 2 February 2010 (UTC)) *'''Delete''' - for reasons stated above. (] (]) 02:56, 2 February 2010 (UTC))

Revision as of 10:53, 2 February 2010

Michelle Crawford

Michelle Crawford (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

minor criminal, even if convicted. Was deprodded with the comment "Notable for being the first publicized arrest using a controversial new law in New York State. A "test case" for the new law's enforcement and application.)" Might conceivably become notable eventually, if it reaches the appellate courts, but its still at the first level of jurisdiction. Additional justification "e first person in Western New York charged with Drunk Driving with an enhanced felony DWI" -- not even first person in NY. To my view, a textbook case of DO NO HARM. I will support any other admin who agrees with me that this is a case for speedy deletion. DGG ( talk ) 21:02, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Categories: