| Revision as of 15:46, 2 February 2010 editIhcoyc (talk | contribs)30,401 edits →Michelle Crawford: delete← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:48, 3 February 2010 edit undoVictor falk (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,988 edits →Michelle Crawford: *'''Snowball delete''' per all above ~~~~Next edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| *'''Delete''' - for reasons stated above. (] (]) 02:56, 2 February 2010 (UTC)) | *'''Delete''' - for reasons stated above. (] (]) 02:56, 2 February 2010 (UTC)) | ||
| *'''Delete'''. The passage of a criminal statute does not make the first person charged with a violation notable. - ] (]) 15:46, 2 February 2010 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. The passage of a criminal statute does not make the first person charged with a violation notable. - ] (]) 15:46, 2 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Snowball delete''' per all above <sup><small><font color="green">]</font></small></sup> <font color="green">]</font><sup><small> <font color="green">]</font></small></sup> 12:48, 3 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:48, 3 February 2010
Michelle Crawford
- Michelle Crawford (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
minor criminal, even if convicted. Was deprodded with the comment "Notable for being the first publicized arrest using a controversial new law in New York State. A "test case" for the new law's enforcement and application.)" Might conceivably become notable eventually, if it reaches the appellate courts, but its still at the first level of jurisdiction. Additional justification "e first person in Western New York charged with Drunk Driving with an enhanced felony DWI" -- not even first person in NY. To my view, a textbook case of DO NO HARM. I will support any other admin who agrees with me that this is a case for speedy deletion. DGG ( talk ) 21:02, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:BLP1E. -- Blanchardb -- timed 21:58, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete, obviously. There is no notability to speak of here. BLPzeroE. JBsupreme (talk) 22:11, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- Strong delete per the above. Not remotely encyclopedically notable. Glenfarclas (talk) 00:29, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - for reasons stated above. (GregJackP (talk) 02:56, 2 February 2010 (UTC))
- Delete. The passage of a criminal statute does not make the first person charged with a violation notable. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:46, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- Snowball delete per all above victor falk 12:48, 3 February 2010 (UTC)